WellSpyder, on 2017-October-24, 03:11, said:
What's obviously meant is what it would have specified had it been sufficient (either because the preceding bids were at a lower level or if they'd bid the same denomination at a sufficient level).
Posted 2017-October-24, 08:52
WellSpyder, on 2017-October-24, 03:11, said:
Posted 2017-October-24, 09:00
WellSpyder, on 2017-October-24, 07:28, said:
Law 29C said:
Posted 2017-October-24, 09:12
barmar, on 2017-October-24, 08:52, said:
Posted 2017-October-24, 09:15
pran, on 2017-October-24, 09:00, said:
Posted 2017-October-24, 09:28
WellSpyder, on 2017-October-24, 09:12, said:
Posted 2017-October-24, 09:46
barmar, on 2017-October-24, 09:28, said:
Posted 2017-October-24, 14:53
WellSpyder, on 2017-October-24, 09:15, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 00:54
WellSpyder, on 2017-October-24, 09:46, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 03:28
pran, on 2017-October-24, 05:58, said:
pran, on 2017-October-24, 14:53, said:
lamford, on 2017-October-23, 08:16, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 05:40
WellSpyder, on 2017-October-25, 03:28, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 07:00
pran, on 2017-October-24, 09:00, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 07:42
Posted 2017-October-25, 07:43
VixTD, on 2017-October-25, 07:00, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 08:23
pran, on 2017-October-25, 07:42, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 08:55
pran, on 2017-October-25, 07:42, said:
barmar, on 2017-October-25, 08:23, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 09:11
Posted 2017-October-25, 09:15
barmar, on 2017-October-25, 08:23, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 09:54
Posted 2017-October-25, 14:56
barmar, on 2017-October-25, 09:11, said:
Posted 2017-October-25, 19:32
pran, on 2017-October-24, 14:53, said: