In a pair tour I just hosted, NS got a 2♥XX-1 result. S reported to me that he found suspicious of the pass by E and W. He even said they might chat on MSN. I reviewed the board a few times and found no evidence of cheating. Otherwise, the contract would be down two or more. Therfore, the result stand. Even though the pass seemed a bit odd, I think it was acceptable. However, after I had explained to S, he still insisted that I should do further investigation and report to abuse. I am just wondering how you interpret the pass and how you comfort and explain to players like S? Thanks in advnace!
How should I handle case like this? pass is acceptable!?
#1
Posted 2005-October-13, 00:26
In a pair tour I just hosted, NS got a 2♥XX-1 result. S reported to me that he found suspicious of the pass by E and W. He even said they might chat on MSN. I reviewed the board a few times and found no evidence of cheating. Otherwise, the contract would be down two or more. Therfore, the result stand. Even though the pass seemed a bit odd, I think it was acceptable. However, after I had explained to S, he still insisted that I should do further investigation and report to abuse. I am just wondering how you interpret the pass and how you comfort and explain to players like S? Thanks in advnace!
#2
Posted 2005-October-13, 02:08
Edit: Got the vulnerability wrong. Still -400 is better than 5♦+1 which is -420, but 3 down is -1600!
This post has been edited by Gerben42: 2005-October-13, 05:42
#3
Posted 2005-October-13, 04:50
#4
Posted 2005-October-13, 05:03
As has been posted before, not agreeing with a player's bidding methods is not cause for any adjustment.
#5
Posted 2005-October-13, 05:27
In a junior international match this auction came up:
North: 2♦: Weak two in ♥ or ♠
East: Double: Strong
South: Redouble: Wants to play 2♦xx
West: Pass: Meant as "partner please bid something I don't know where to go", understood as "wants to play this"
North: Pass: "Want to play this also"
East: Pass: "partner wants to play this, can't see why not.
NS +2360
I guess these EW were more experienced than your EW here, and yet this costly misunderstanding happened.
#6
Posted 2005-October-13, 05:39
While I understand why N/S is suspicious, I have VERY little sympathy for their complaint.
1. South decided to make a vulnerable 2 level overcall on a crappy 3=5=2=2 hand. When this tactic produces less than stellar results, the partnership starts whining for an adjustment. Quick word of advice: If your partner redoubles for business and the opps can set you two, you might want to have some partnership discussion regarding overcall style
2. About that redouble... I'm not sure WHAT redouble should show in this position. I think that I prefer 2 card trump support, values and a low ODR, suggesting defending that the three level (I'd be interested to hear what other people play). A others have noted, its entirely possible that E/W believed that N/S were having some kind of meltdown where South had passed a SOS redouble. From West's perspective, the hand could easily be a complete misfit - East didn't support either of his minors or rebid in Spades.
3. If I can "only" see the E/W hands, its unclear that defending 2HXX is a winning action. If I can see all 4 hands, I'm gonna defend a lot better than down 1.
#7
Posted 2005-October-13, 05:48
rwylee, on Oct 13 2005, 07:26 AM, said:
I agree. It looks like this was handled very well.
Perhaps South was too persistent here; but probably they just need to be reassured that you will keep an eye on E/W. If you have time at the end of the tourney, it wouldn't hurt to look at E/W's other hands, just in case. And if you tell South that you are going to to this, then that should keep them happy.
#8
Posted 2005-October-13, 08:33
#9
Posted 2005-October-13, 09:52
TD’s are busy enough as it is.
The enemy here was MSN, a change from the ‘mysterious’ kibitzer – how the heck does a player know what his opps are up to, they could be sitting in the same room.
jb
same with complaints of bad behaviour - ask the player to send the details to abuse@
http://www.bridgebas...h/scrnsnap.html
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#10
Posted 2005-October-13, 10:39
#11
Posted 2005-October-13, 12:46
This would apply in this situation. It is perhaps a dangerous agreement if there are forgets, and that could easily be what happened here, as others have suggested.
This doesn't come up so often, and one might think it's mostly to expose psyche xx's, but there are legitimate times it comes up. Playing in a regional, I opened 1C, strong, and my LHO overcalled 1D, suction, showing hearts or spades and clubs. Partner passed and RHO bid 1H, pass or correct. I doubled for takeout of hearts and LHO redoubled, pass, pass, back to me. They had no agreement about the xx, but it turned out LHO had meant it as "I have a good heart suit" (1S would show S+C, and pass would just show hearts normally). Partner had 6 hearts too and was trying to make a penalty pass. Sadly, this was with a partner with whom I had no agreement and so I pulled instead of taking our juicy penalty.
Andy
#12
Posted 2005-October-14, 04:29
pigpenz, on Oct 13 2005, 11:39 AM, said:
i just hit alt-prntscrn and paste into a word document...
#13
Posted 2005-October-14, 07:45
luke warm, on Oct 14 2005, 03:29 AM, said:
I just hit print screen and then paste...
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#14
Posted 2005-October-14, 17:00

Help

E 1♠
S 2♥
W X
N XX
AP