BBO Discussion Forums: The Misadventures of Rex and Jay #5645 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Misadventures of Rex and Jay #5645 standards for an overcall....

#1 User is offline   microcap 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 307
  • Joined: 2004-March-08

Posted 2007-December-19, 13:32

Rex and I had been actually getting along recently, but all heck h :P as broken loose again as usual :lol:

Both sides are vulnerable at IMPs, you sit in second seat. RHO opens 1D. Which of the following hands do you overcall with one spade? Please elaborate as much as possible, and please give any thoughts as to your minimum requirements for overcalls. Also please mention your changes at different colors if any.

Hand One-- AKxxx xxx xx xxx

Hand Two-- xxxxx xxx Kx KQx

Hand Three-- AKJx xxx xxx xxx

Hand Four -- AKJx xx xxx xxxx

Hand Five -- 10xxxx Kx Qjx Kxx


I suppose i could go on forever but start with these five...thanks as always!! Hope everyone is having a good holiday season...

:unsure:
0

#2 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2007-December-19, 13:41

How about none of them?

Some might overcall the AKxxx suit or the two strong four-card spades suits. At least they are good suits. But why would anyone ever overcall on 10xxxx or xxxxx? These aren't even good hands.

As for the three hands with good suits, they have very little else to recommend them. A vul overcall on AKxxx and out at IMPs will get you too high too often. A vul overcall on a chuncky four card suit is OK when there is no other option. But how about pass? The hands are not that good (to say the least), and there is no reason to take any immediate action.

Partner is still there. Most of the time, if the hand is yours you will have plenty of opportunities to get back into the auction.

I can only assume that the rationale for bidding over 1 is to take away the one level from the opponents. That is a fine idea as far as it goes, but partners have this annoying tendency to believe your bidding, and he will probably assume that you have a better hand than these. So, you may make life harder for your opponents on occasion, but you will make life harder for partner quite often.

But that is just my opinion. I have been told that I pass too often. :unsure:
0

#3 User is offline   microcap 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 307
  • Joined: 2004-March-08

Posted 2007-December-19, 13:43

Just to clarify, the opening bid was 1 diamond, though the logic isn't much different over 1 club i suppose.

Also, none of them is a perfectly legitimate response! LOL
0

#4 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,655
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2007-December-19, 13:43

Only the first one is close for me.

My feeling is that there are certain hands where you "have to" get into the auction. These are typically hands where you have either good values or good shape, and the contract is likely to belong to your side. But all of these example hands are relatively flat and relatively weak, so none fit that definition.

With hands where you don't "have to" get into the bidding, I'd like to have a decent five-card suit to bid. Only the first hand has such a suit, and I'd consider passing even that if the spots are truly small (AKT8x and out I would always overcall, AK432 I would probably pass at vulnerable).

I have nothing against overcalling four-card suits on good hands and would bid on either of the hands with AKJx if you gave me an outside ace or so. I've certainly overcalled weaker four card suits than this as well (I think KQxx or QJTx is about my lower limit) but again always on good hands.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#5 User is offline   ASkolnick 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 385
  • Joined: 2007-November-20

Posted 2007-December-19, 13:45

I think this is a matter of style you have agreed with your partners. My general rule is would you like it if he led K from Kx, however with other partners I defer.

When I play very sound overcalls where suit quality is more important.:

1) I think 1S is OK.
2) No.
3) No, no shape.
4) 1S is OK, no objection to not overcalling.
5) No.

However, with some I play a more agressive matchpoint style.

1) No.
2) Yes.
3) The one I play matchpoints with assumes 5 card majors.
4) No.
5) Yes.

And depending on the partnership, either way can work. Sound overcalls will get you in less trouble with bad suits, however, you may occasionally lose out in competing.
0

#6 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2007-December-19, 13:46

None of the above.
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#7 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-December-19, 13:55

The first is really an automatic 1S for me, wow.

Hand 2 and 5 are clear passes. It is not that I will never overcall on such a suit, but the hand would need to be quite a bit better. Give me a 5-2-2-4 shape with an 11-count including an ace and I may overcall on such a suit.

Hands 3 and 4 are really tempting but vulnerable second seat at IMPs I won't do it. Add the club king to hand 4 and I will overcall 1S for sure.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#8 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2007-December-19, 13:59

I overcall on 1, but I'm from the dab00z school of overcalling.

I wouldn't overcall on 2 and 5. I'd overcall on 3 and 4 at MPs but not at IMPs, in particular on the 4333 hand.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#9 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-December-19, 14:03

Only #1.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#10 User is offline   PassedOut 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,691
  • Joined: 2006-February-21
  • Location:Upper Michigan
  • Interests:Music, films, computer programming, politics, bridge

Posted 2007-December-19, 14:12

None of them.

Would like to be able to show the strong suits in 1, 3, and 4, but don't want partner to have to cater to hands this weak.
The growth of wisdom may be gauged exactly by the diminution of ill temper. — Friedrich Nietzsche
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists — that is why they invented hell. — Bertrand Russell
0

#11 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-December-19, 14:41

The first one only. Not much playing strength but at least it's 5 cards and it may be important to direct the lead.
0

#12 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-December-19, 14:45

Hand 1 if NV. If V, perhaps hand 1 too, depending on tactical factors.
0

#13 User is offline   goobers 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 372
  • Joined: 2006-December-04

Posted 2007-December-19, 14:59

Really surprised at how many people would pass the first one, I wouldn't have hesitated in overcalling.
0

#14 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-December-19, 16:15

microcap, on Dec 19 2007, 09:32 PM, said:

Hand One-- AKxxx xxx xx xxx

Hand Two-- xxxxx xxx Kx KQx

Hand Three-- AKJx xxx xxx xxx

Hand Four -- AKJx xx xxx xxxx

Hand Five -- 10xxxx Kx Qjx Kxx

I'd definitely overcall hand 1.
Would certainly not overcall 2 or 3.
Hand 4 I'd overcall NV at matchpoints.
Hand 5 I'd overcall NV or at matchpoints, but probably sometimes v at imp's too.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#15 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-December-19, 16:19

1 - of course!
2, 3, 4, 5 - no
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#16 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-December-19, 16:38

hand 1 the only one where I can think of overcalling, 2 spades is also possible.
0

#17 User is offline   bhall 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 216
  • Joined: 2007-April-29

Posted 2007-December-19, 16:51

None of them.

The rule I tell my partner is: Bid for some game holding a strong (15-17) notrump's worth of high cards, even with no particular fit, over my one-level overcalls. Over my 2-level overcalls, a weak (12-14) notrump's worth is sufficient.

I don't guarantee that game will make, only that it should have a decent play. I also don't require that partner be as conservative as I am.
just plain Bill
0

#18 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-December-19, 17:38

1) Asolutely

2) No way

5) No way

3,4) I've seen and heard of people better than me bid with these hands... I don't think I would right here.
Kevin Fay
0

#19 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2007-December-20, 01:20

1) yes
2) no (all seats)
3) no in 2nd seat, yes if P is a passed hand
4) no in 2nd seat, yes if p is a passed hand
5) no (all seats)
Chris Gibson
0

#20 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2007-December-20, 02:04

All 5 Hands with no hesitation, never anything but pass.

The first hand 2 Spade if I had some shape.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users