BBO Discussion Forums: double 3S double - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

double 3S double

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-October-27, 13:06

1-x-2-2
3-3-4-p
p-x-p-4
end

your comments on the auction (from the doubler's side)? can you give example hands for doubler and advancer? does vulnerability/form of scoring matter?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   TylerE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,772
  • Joined: 2006-January-30

Posted 2008-October-27, 13:12

X = Penalty, but may not be beat in hand off the top. Partner has shown some values here, after all.

Axxx
x
KQxx
Kxxx
0

#3 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-October-27, 13:17

TylerE, on Oct 27 2008, 11:12 AM, said:

X = Penalty, but may not be beat in hand off the top. Partner has shown some values here, after all.

Axxx
x
KQxx
Kxxx

While I'm fine with 3 on this, it isn't close to a double of 4.

I'm more inclined to peg this hand as something more like:

AQxx, Kx, AQxx, xxx

Pard is allowed to pull, but I wouldn't expect it more than 15% of the time.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#4 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-October-27, 13:17

TylerE, on Oct 27 2008, 01:12 PM, said:

X = Penalty, but may not be beat in hand off the top. Partner has shown some values here, after all.

Axxx
x
KQxx
Kxxx

I agree it is penalty, but probably with s.th. like AQ. With the hand above, I would be expecting overtricks in 4 more often than undertricks. How many tricks do you think we get on defense when partner may have KQxxx xx Jxxx xx? Or KQxxxx xx xxx xx?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users