BBO Discussion Forums: One More for the Road? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

One More for the Road?

#1 User is offline   MarkDean 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 595
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Location:Pleasanton, CA, US

Posted 2009-September-06, 11:40

Scoring: MP


1 - (1) - Pass - (2)
2 - (Pass) - 3 - (3)
5 - (Pass) - ?

Do you agree with the first two rounds?
What now?
0

#2 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-September-06, 12:04

MarkDean, on Sep 6 2009, 12:40 PM, said:

Dealer: North
Vul: Both
Scoring: MP
9854
Q9
Q6
AQT96
 


1 - (1) - Pass - (2)
2 - (Pass) - 3 - (3)
5 - (Pass) - ?

Do you agree with the first two rounds?
What now?

I bid 6 as I have 4 useful cards partner has no right to expect
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#3 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,683
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2009-September-06, 12:15

Agree with the 6, but don't like the initial pass. 2 is simple and would definitely be my bid. I play it as non forcing, but even if it is forcing, I don't mind partner rebidding 2.
0

#4 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-September-06, 12:16

I'd have bid 2 over 1.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   cherdanno 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,640
  • Joined: 2009-February-16

Posted 2009-September-06, 13:33

I disagree with pass. I disagree with 3 - partner is typically 6-4 for his bidding, and we have a great hand for that. I would bid 4.
Now I would like to abstain, but I am closer to a grand try with 6 than to passing 5 - which goes to show that our previous bidding was too little. In fact, yes I would bid 6.
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
0

#6 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2009-September-06, 13:38

Hate the previous bidding.

I have bid as if I have a yarborough.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#7 User is offline   MFA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,625
  • Joined: 2006-October-04
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2009-September-06, 14:09

Our bidding so far is extremely bad. What has partner done to us, since we don't respect his bidding, not even his opening bid?

Now we have a grand slam try. 6 to show the ace.
Michael Askgaard
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-September-06, 16:34

There is no grand try to show both red Queens and the Ace of clubs. You can't have that. So, the only "grand try" is 7.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-September-07, 01:49

6C is obvious if I'm so terrible that I have bid this way to start with.
0

#10 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-September-07, 08:19

What to do now? I have showed a hand with no tricks so far on every opportunity. This was wrong, but I have no idea how to recover.

I think Arend, Justin et all deserve a lol for 6 Club. Yes the hand is worth a grand slam try. But how can you interprete a bid from someone as a GSF who had showed a yarb so far at every opportunity?
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#11 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-September-07, 08:24

Codo, on Sep 7 2009, 09:19 AM, said:

What to do now? I have showed a hand with no tricks so far on every opportunity. This was wrong, but I have no idea how to recover.

I think Arend, Justin et all deserve a lol for 6 Club. Yes the hand is worth a grand slam try. But how can you interprete a bid from someone as a GSF who had showed a yarb so far at every opportunity?

In fairness, Justin came close to an explanation. The "terrible" comment suggests that 6 would be a partnership-specific treatment, showing first-round control of clubs, two other cards, and a complete admission of being an idiot in the prior auction. If that would be so understood, from past experience, then the call is perfect.

Others hinted at that implicit agreement, as well.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#12 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-September-07, 08:32

kenrexford, on Sep 7 2009, 09:24 AM, said:

Codo, on Sep 7 2009, 09:19 AM, said:

What to do now? I have showed a hand with no tricks so far on every opportunity. This was wrong, but I have no idea how to recover.

I think Arend, Justin et all deserve a lol for 6 Club. Yes the hand is worth a grand slam try. But how can you interprete a bid from someone as a GSF who had showed a yarb so far at every opportunity?

In fairness, Justin came close to an explanation. The "terrible" comment suggests that 6 would be a partnership-specific treatment, showing first-round control of clubs, two other cards, and a complete admission of being an idiot in the prior auction. If that would be so understood, from past experience, then the call is perfect.

Others hinted at that implicit agreement, as well.

:lol:
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#13 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,031
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-September-07, 15:56

Hi,

No, I ont agree with your first two rounds, I would have bid 2C.
I dont care, if you play it as forcing / nonforcing, I have both.
I dont agree with 3D as well, this is basically only a weak preference,
3D showes nothing.

Now after I showed nothing, because I liked it to play hide and seek
with partner I have to guess, if I have to bid 6D or not.
I certainly have the values for the bid, even the values to try for seven,
but it is a pure guess, if they have two cashing tricks or not.

I would pass.
Maybe passing now is of similar quality as my bidding the rounds
before, that would mean I am consistent.
In the end, if I did bid the two rounds as I did, why should may IQ suddenly
have gone through the sky?

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#14 User is offline   MattieShoe 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 160
  • Joined: 2009-September-04

Posted 2009-September-07, 17:44

If partner opened 1, then he has less than what, 22 points? HCP aren't there at least. I don't have a stopper in opponents suit... I'd expect partner to have a long suit but be shy on points, but might as well play 5 if you're going to play 4, so preempt opponents with 5. They could have AK right off the top. I'd pass. But then again, I'm a scaredy cat with borderline stuff like this.

Edit: missed a Q when I looked at the hand initially. Thought there was only 8HCP. Couldn't figure out why everybody was recommending 2 with that hand, but makes sense with that extra queen. :-)

I'd have never thought of 6 but that sounds like a good bid given the two extra points :-)
0

#15 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-September-07, 17:58

as JLAL said, 6C...but as least a little sympathy for the previous bidding. IF i couldnt't bring myself to bid 2C on the first round, this is where I am at.....6C obvious, now
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#16 User is offline   MarkDean 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 595
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Location:Pleasanton, CA, US

Posted 2009-September-07, 19:32

I still would pass first round, but I agree 3 was too timid - I was overly influenced by the lack of a third diamond.

Anyways, I was just doing a sanity check. I bid 6, thinking perhaps I should be trying for a grand. Down 1. Partner had

--
AJ8xx
AJT9xxx
x
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users