Card play analysis
#21
Posted 2009-December-12, 12:23
#22
Posted 2009-December-12, 13:04
Maybe you'll even get a book offer :-)
#23
Posted 2009-December-12, 14:53
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#25
Posted 2009-December-12, 16:56
Still, I'm glad that I didn't read this thread until it was too late to participate - I'm not sure that I could face 100 boards of trying to bid in a way that Justin considers normal.
PS: Will the rest of us be allowed to nitpick your analysis?
#26
Posted 2009-December-12, 17:11
kfay, on Dec 12 2009, 02:04 PM, said:
Maybe you'll even get a book offer :-)
+1.
This would be extraordinarily helpful to the whole community. This is an extremely kind offer, and kudos to you for doing it.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#27
Posted 2009-December-12, 18:30
wyman, on Dec 12 2009, 06:11 PM, said:
kfay, on Dec 12 2009, 02:04 PM, said:
Maybe you'll even get a book offer :-)
+1.
This would be extraordinarily helpful to the whole community. This is an extremely kind offer, and kudos to you for doing it.
Agree - there are ten very fortunate players here, and the skill level varies a lot, so I expect there will be some variety.
I would suggest Justin picks a few of his favorites from the 100, and posts them here - with perhaps leaving the contributor's name off the analysis.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#28
Posted 2009-December-12, 22:53
#29
Posted 2009-December-12, 23:03
#30
Posted 2009-December-12, 23:33
Jlall, on Dec 13 2009, 12:03 AM, said:
Not if you wait a week or two. I suppose with BB could dredge them up, but that seems like a lot of work.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#31
Posted 2009-December-12, 23:45
And well done in San Diego too - two 2nds in major Nationals against the world's best = good stuff.
#32
Posted 2009-December-13, 00:00
Yeah I think I will just leave it up to the people if they want to post any/all of their hands + what I said I am totally fine with that. Really I just want to help the 10 who signed up, there is not really anything attached other than that, and it's not a self promotion thing for me. I really don't want people to be nervous or overwhelmed feeling like their mistakes are in the limelight.
So, just for the record, I am totally fine if anyone participating in this posts my thoughts, and if you rather wouldn't that is fine, I will not show anyone.
Also, Gnasher and others, if hands get posted with my thoughts on them I would be happy for you guys to critique/discuss my comments! Would be kind of cool for me actually. I am obv fallible and might well miss some stuff. Again this is not supposed to be about self promotion/ego boosting for me, or writing a book, or anything like that, and I am happy for it to be discussed if you think I am wrong/have made an error. Will be good for my game!
And lol at the thought of 100 hands bid my way! I used to play in teaching tables and bid all 4 hands objectively with what I thought the right sequences were. It was pretty funny to get a taste of my own medicine! Only thing scarier would be 100 hands bid kenrexford style imo
#33
Posted 2009-December-13, 11:42
#34
Posted 2009-December-13, 12:36
This is very generous of Justin.....doing this kind of analysis takes time...altho I suspect Justin is far faster than most, and probably uses the keyboard faster than people of my generation.
#35
Posted 2009-December-13, 13:35
#37
Posted 2009-December-14, 07:00
Can anyone tell me how to create a file with the 10 selected deals? I played these tourneys using the new web client, so there are no local log files.
#39
Posted 2009-December-14, 07:43
#40
Posted 2009-December-14, 08:04