BBO Discussion Forums: Sure about that? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Sure about that? ACBL Unit Game

#1 User is offline   McBruce 

  • NOS (usually)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 724
  • Joined: 2003-June-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Westminster BC Canada

Posted 2010-November-18, 12:40



The 2♠ call was explained as 'natural, at least 4 spades' when North asked after it was passed around to him.

North expressed considerable doubt that 2♠ was actually natural and asked several follow up questions as to whether it might in fact be a cue-bid, and what other options East had.

When North turned out to have psyched the 1♠ call, E-W were not amused. 4♦ was not a success, while 4♠ would have been fine, had North not talked E-W into believing that perhaps they had a misunderstanding.

How do you rule?
ACBL TD--got my start in 2002 directing games at BBO!
Please come back to the live game; I directed enough online during COVID for several lifetimes.
Bruce McIntyre, Yamaha WX5 Roland AE-10G AKAI EWI SOLO virtuoso-in-training
0

#2 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2010-November-18, 13:18

View PostMcBruce, on 2010-November-18, 12:40, said:



The 2♠ call was explained as 'natural, at least 4 spades' when North asked after it was passed around to him.

North expressed considerable doubt that 2♠ was actually natural and asked several follow up questions as to whether it might in fact be a cue-bid, and what other options East had.

When North turned out to have psyched the 1♠ call, E-W were not amused. 4♦ was not a success, while 4♠ would have been fine, had North not talked E-W into believing that perhaps they had a misunderstanding.

How do you rule?


Law 73D2 (Misleading opponents with remarks e.g. questions) Law 73E (This deception was not through a call or play)
0

#3 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,693
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2010-November-18, 13:19

North is coffeehousing, and blatantly so. Give him a PP for that. Adjust the score to 4♠ making 4 by EW for both sides (although I think one might make a case for an overtrick, either for both sides or for the OS).
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#4 User is offline   campboy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,347
  • Joined: 2009-July-21

Posted 2010-November-18, 17:38

Give North a swingeing penalty. And adjust, obviously. That is beneath contempt. I don't think South will double 4♠ because it will (from his perspective) just get pulled to 5♦.
0

#5 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,423
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2010-November-18, 18:14

Any thoughts to 4Sx, or 5Hx, or is it going to be screamingly obvious that North psyched?
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#6 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2010-November-18, 18:23

4♠X? :) the double coming form south...
0

#7 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-November-19, 09:31

Im sure it's not legal but I would rule 4♠ doubled plus 1 to show my utter contempt for the coffee housing and pray that north had the gall to bring it in front of a committee.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#8 User is offline   campboy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,347
  • Joined: 2009-July-21

Posted 2010-November-19, 10:10

View Postggwhiz, on 2010-November-19, 09:31, said:

Im sure it's not legal but I would rule 4♠ doubled plus 1 to show my utter contempt for the coffee housing and pray that north had the gall to bring it in front of a committee.

It's certainly legal, it's just a judgement question as to whether the score is "at all probable" (to give it to N/S) or "likely" (to give it to both sides).
0

#9 User is offline   McBruce 

  • NOS (usually)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 724
  • Joined: 2003-June-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Westminster BC Canada

Posted 2010-November-19, 18:36

We all want to adjust to 4♠ based on an infraction that occurred AFTER West passed 2♠? What makes you think that a side willing to pass in a partscore is going to compete all the way to 4♠ without the razzle-dazzle?
ACBL TD--got my start in 2002 directing games at BBO!
Please come back to the live game; I directed enough online during COVID for several lifetimes.
Bruce McIntyre, Yamaha WX5 Roland AE-10G AKAI EWI SOLO virtuoso-in-training
0

#10 User is offline   bluejak 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 2007-August-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool, UK
  • Interests:Bridge Laws, Cats, Railways, Transport timetables

Posted 2010-November-19, 18:46

They got to 4♦. West has ♠KQJT: I think it not unreasonable that he would correct to 4♠ without North's antics.
David Stevenson

Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users