BBO Discussion Forums: Top scores - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Top scores

#1 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2011-June-02, 21:26

If my counting is correct, Phil and Cherdano both have the highest score with 700. Other high scores were achieved by Gerben (690), Echognome (680), Vampyr (680) and Gwnn (680). Cherdano had the great advantage of discussing the hands with me before I sent them out so maybe he should be disqualified. On the other hand, nobody made as many complaints as Phil, so perhaps he should be disqualified too. :P

Either way, if I do another poll then I will ask both of them to be on the panel.

I have to apologize to Kayin. We discussed that he would be on the panel and he sent me his comments but I messed up. I hope Alex forgives me and will be on the panel if I do it again.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
1

#2 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,848
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-June-02, 22:45

Thank You Han for taking the time to do this. Great job.


As for the many questions I note none of the "issue bids" were alerted so I think the answer to most of the questions must be NO.
0

#3 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2011-June-03, 02:31

Top Score for Han. Well done!
http://bss2html.atspace.cc/
0

#4 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-June-03, 03:54

Yes, I enjoyed that a lot. The problems were all pretty challenging.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   y66 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,496
  • Joined: 2006-February-24

Posted 2011-June-03, 04:58

On behalf of lurkers, thank you Han for interesting problems and others for many thoughtful comments.
If you lose all hope, you can always find it again -- Richard Ford in The Sportswriter
0

#6 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,198
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-June-03, 07:02

Thanks Han. Great job, as expected.
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
0

#7 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2011-June-03, 07:07

Rigged.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#8 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2011-June-03, 08:37

Very nice job Han, I thoroughly enjoyed reading through them - Thanks!
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#9 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2011-June-03, 15:39

Great job and very interesting hands.

The only improvement I would suggest is to structure the problems so that everyone is answering according to the same methods. IMO it doesn't work very well if panelists are invited to answer according to their own preferred method because people may agree on the judgment issues but make different choices, or vice versa. So maybe provide more detailed information about agreements relevant to the problem and/or stipulate that there are no other relevant agreements.
http://bridgethoughts.blogspot.com
0

#10 User is offline   AlexJonson 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 496
  • Joined: 2010-November-03

Posted 2011-June-03, 16:32

I enjoyed the poll, and enjoyed the comments and scoring. Well done as everyone says.

I think it is best to allow the panel to give their own viewpoint, and even to allow whinging from some competitors.
0

#11 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2011-June-03, 22:27

 nigel_k, on 2011-June-03, 15:39, said:

Great job and very interesting hands.

The only improvement I would suggest is to structure the problems so that everyone is answering according to the same methods. IMO it doesn't work very well if panelists are invited to answer according to their own preferred method because people may agree on the judgment issues but make different choices, or vice versa. So maybe provide more detailed information about agreements relevant to the problem and/or stipulate that there are no other relevant agreements.


I think you are right and that some of the problems would have been better if I had written more about the system. On the other hand, the lack of structure led to some interesting comments. I'm thinking about the comment from Frances about 1H -2C and the comment from Fred about 1C - 1H - 1S - 2D - 3C. Definitely something I will pay more attention to next time.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
1

#12 User is offline   mfa1010 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 796
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark

Posted 2011-June-04, 05:41

Thank you han for an interesting set and excellent work. Well done.

A suggestion:
Try to give us exact cards instead of x's. Especially in the lead problem it can matter a lot. And in the potential misfit problem 6.
We can pretend that they are all deuces, of course, but even then I still prefer to have them written as deuces just out of habit. :)

But again, good job!
Michael Askgaard
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users