BBO Discussion Forums: Have you discussed ...? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Have you discussed ...?

#1 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-November-23, 17:16

After


What are:
4
4
4NT
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#2 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-November-23, 17:34

Nat, nat, KC? eg:

Ax KQJxx Jxxx xx - X then 4H

Ax AQxx Jxxx xxx - X then 4S

Perhaps "slam try with no club control" rather than keycard for 4N if you play that usually, I do not, as you know I'm a big fan of keycard heh.
0

#3 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2011-November-23, 19:59

Agree with Justin

X and 4H should show COG hands like 2S and 6H hearts (5 great H). X and 4S any hand with 4H/2S where you are freerolling for a better 4/4 H fit. Reaching the superior game is more profitable than having specialized/weird slam tools.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users