IMPs
Partner takes out pre-empt How high?
#3
Posted 2012-February-02, 19:35
#5
Posted 2012-February-02, 19:54
#6
Posted 2012-February-03, 04:42
#8
Posted 2012-February-03, 07:57
whereagles, on 2012-February-03, 04:42, said:
As doubler I would expect some random 7 or 8 HCPS and hopefully four cards in a major.
I have 5 spades and 6 working points, which is better then what partner expects.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#9
Posted 2012-February-03, 08:31
Everyone would double 3♣ with KQx AKxx Kxxxx x, where game is pretty poor. If we knew we were facing four spades we could expect game to be a lot better, but partner often raise when he has four spades and a singleton club.
#10
Posted 2012-February-03, 08:46
gnasher, on 2012-February-03, 08:31, said:
Indeed the hand opposite might have only 2 spades (see the companion thread...)
#11
Posted 2012-February-03, 09:51
I am a little surprised at Justin's comment that this is an obvious 4♠ call. I don't doubt that 4♠ is a reasonable call, and it is tempting. But I wouldn't go so far as to say it is obvious.
#12
Posted 2012-February-03, 13:14
Codo, on 2012-February-03, 07:57, said:
I have 5 spades and 6 working points, which is better then what partner expects.
I disagree entirely. Aces are always good but to paraphrase Orwell, "some Aces are more equal than others." The A♣ is the least valuable ace you can have in a suit contract because it cannot possibly contribute to the establishment of length tricks in any suit. Any other Ace would have that potential.
- You have 7 HCP, slightly below the standard expectation of 8, and 5 of them are in the opener's suit. Contrast with ♠AJxxx ♥Qxx ♦xx ♣xxx.
- If partner is void in clubs, you only have 2 working points.
- You have 5-3-3-2, one of the 3 worst shapes you can have. (OK 4 if you side with Reese on the idea of 4-4-4-1 being not good for offense.)
- Your long suit is emaciated.
- Your partnership's finesses will be into the hand most likely to hold the missing honors, unless we're talking specifically about Axx(x)♥ and playing RHO for the K♥.
- Your spot cards basically stink.
- You have every reason to expect bad breaks and your hand won't handle them well.
I agree that 4♠ is possible, but it usually won't be there unless partner can raise me, and sometimes he WILL raise me to game and I won't make it anyway.
The fact that the opponents preempted does NOT make your hand any stronger than it actually is. You have no unexpected assets. Your hand will not be unexpectedly pleasant to partner however he bids over 3♠.
Expect 3♠ to fail sometimes; expect partner to raise you to 4♠ often and for it to fail about half of the time that he raises you.
#13
Posted 2012-February-03, 13:38
#14
Posted 2012-February-03, 14:12
ArtK78, on 2012-February-03, 09:51, said:
I am a little surprised at Justin's comment that this is an obvious 4♠ call. I don't doubt that 4♠ is a reasonable call, and it is tempting. But I wouldn't go so far as to say it is obvious.
Looks like you need that Meckwell Back Brace worse than I originally thought
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#15
Posted 2012-February-03, 21:37
"If you're driving [the Honda S2000] with the top up, the storm outside had better have a name."
Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.

Help
