BBO Discussion Forums: How to push to game? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

How to push to game? ...and which one?

#1 User is offline   bd71 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 491
  • Joined: 2009-September-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Suburban Philadelphia

Posted 2012-March-21, 22:41



Matchpoints.

What calls do you consider, and what do you choose?

EDIT: Agreement is that 2H is forcing.
0

#2 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,826
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-March-21, 22:44

Not stated but for me 2h was nf, in any case I think I would just rkc on clubs with 4d, now.
I hope pard would just rebid 2s with a crappy overcall.

3d would be the go slow approach which is second option.
0

#3 User is offline   Cthulhu D 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,169
  • Joined: 2011-November-21
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:Overbidding

Posted 2012-March-21, 23:11

I have no idea, I'd start with 3D, caring not if partner thinks that is fourth suit forcing or asking for a stopper or what, then maybe try 3NT unless partner tries 3H. I'm thinking long and hard about just punting 4H, but starting with 3D is 'free' so lets do that and see what he comes back with. 6C seems a long way away but I'll be better positioned after 3D.

This is a deal where you wish you where playing roman jump overcalls or another two suited approach that would have let partner bid 2S the first time if he was 5/5. I think the lack of double means that he's probably 5-1-3-4 or 5-1-2-5
0

#4 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-March-21, 23:53

Is partner expected to double with a 5-2-2-4?
0

#5 User is offline   Cthulhu D 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,169
  • Joined: 2011-November-21
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:Overbidding

Posted 2012-March-22, 00:15

Yeah, but then good chance he will bid 3H now, so let's give 3D a go.
0

#6 User is offline   menggq 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: 2010-April-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shanghai China

Posted 2012-March-22, 00:41

2 no forcing.I'd start with 2 cue bid forcing...
0

#7 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,207
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2012-March-22, 02:50

3 this hand is potentially huge, Axxxx, xx, xx, AQxx is sufficient for a slam and in my world, partner should be a lot better than that to bid 3.
0

#8 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2012-March-22, 04:53

What is all this stuff about 2 non forcing? It is obviously forcing for bd71´.

3 is wideranging, as they obviously do not play good/bad 2 NT (not that you should...).


I would go with 3 .
After 3 I would cuebid 4.
After 3 (which would be my default, I try 4 if this is 100 % forcing (it would be for me).
If partner bids 3 NT, I leave it in.
After 4 I hope to find a way to raise clubs slammish without committing us to slam. I would try 4 .
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#9 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,025
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2012-March-22, 09:25

We are playing mps, so if we are staying in game, we may well prefer to be in hearts than in clubs.

However, we don't need to make a committal call now. It is always nice when our cheapest bid is also the most useful.

We have an easy 3 call. Partner will bid 3 with any doubleton, and we have found our trump fit (tho level is as yet unknown). He will bid 3 with 5-1-3-4, as an example, and should bid 4 with 1 heart and 5 clubs, and we will now have to weigh slam in clubs v game in hearts.

One factor that militates in favour of slam is that when partner has 5 clubs and a stiff heart, he can almost certainly establish the heart suit by taking a ruffing finesse through opener.

I am going to drive to slam in clubs (should partner bid 4), since I can't place partner with a K high spade suit and a Q high club suit on this auction: KQJxx x xx QJxxx should, imo, bid 2 rather than 3.

Over a 3 preference, I am going to bid a quiet 4. I expect to be off a heart trick and a black trick, and don't think I have enough 5-level safety to risk the 5-level at mps, but it is close.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#10 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-March-22, 09:40

I can't comment because I do not understand this method of 2 forcing. Can partner have KTxxx xx xx AQxx? Or does 3 show something like AKxxx x xx AQxxx?
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#11 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2012-March-22, 09:42

View PostPhil, on 2012-March-22, 09:40, said:

I can't comment because I do not understand this method of 2 forcing. Can partner have KTxxx xx xx AQxx? Or does 3 show something like AKxxx x xx AQxxx?


What about KQJxx x Qxx QJxx?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#12 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2012-March-22, 17:18

View PostPhil, on 2012-March-22, 09:40, said:

I can't comment because I do not understand this method of 2 forcing. Can partner have KTxxx xx xx AQxx? Or does 3 show something like AKxxx x xx AQxxx?


No, if 2 is forcing, pd can still not have hand #1. Those who play this type of new suit at 2 level as forcing, usually plays the responses to it as in 2/1;

1M-2x
2M (can be only 5 with hands that doesnt wanna make an expensive bid)

Not sure if thats a style OP is using though.

So to answer your questin, overcaller must have a decent hand or shape to bid at 3 level a new suit.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#13 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-March-23, 10:39

Agree with 3D. I thought of 4C but it would depend on agreements whether that's forcing or not.

After 3H, 3S or 3NT I'll bid 4C and hopefully partner gets the message.

ahydra
0

#14 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2012-March-23, 11:52

Another 3 bidder and hopefully establishing GF and sorting it out from there.
0

#15 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2012-March-23, 14:40

If 2 is forcing, then the only bid that partner has to limit his hand is 2 . That wouldn't necessarily show extra length, just less than opening values. Since that didn't happen, game and possibly slam should be in the picture. In a pinch, partner's 3 bid might be more a feature, than an actual suit.

3 stands out as the bid that gives partner the chance to best describe his hand.
0

#16 User is offline   AlexJonson 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 496
  • Joined: 2010-November-03

Posted 2012-March-23, 14:52

I'd bid 4H because partner can never evaluate their hand v mine.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users