BBO Discussion Forums: The least understood seqeunce is.... - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The least understood seqeunce is....

#41 User is offline   madongjun 

  • China
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,724
  • Joined: 2012-August-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:taiyuan/shanxi/China
  • Interests:Economics、sports

Posted 2012-October-24, 03:02

Mabye 3♠ replaced 4♣ was better.now I bid 4♠.
0

#42 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2012-October-24, 04:21

View Postmikeh, on 2012-October-23, 09:29, said:

Back to more general musings: ...

I'm in the 2/1 crowd, but I don't play this 3♣ GF. If I did, 4♠ is weak and 3♠ is strong, both having support. The 4♠ bid would be a sub-minimum 3 card raise (too weak for 1♠ 2♠), or a no-better-place-to-play with a weak hand 2 card support, and 3♠ is 3 card limit raise to allow cue bids.

My main partner is female, so gropes are out of the question. 3♦ would be a stronger hand with no support suggesting NT may be a viable place to play.
0
  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

6 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users