BBO Discussion Forums: 黄金法则原理 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

黄金法则原理 Golden Rule Principle*

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2012-July-08, 03:34

*Golden Rule Principle*

A suit should not be bid twice unless the suit has at least six cards.
This applies not only to the Opener and Responder,but also to the Opponents of the Opening Bidder.
Maybe you thought it was going to be something very complicated and difficult, but there are many bridge players who disregard the concept of the Golden Rule.

*Postulated by Alan Truscott



黄金法则原理

翻译:LyCieR


什么是桥牌的第一金科玉律?艾伦·特鲁斯科特给我们提供了最好的启示!

一个花色不能再叫第两次,除非至少有六张!

这不仅适用于开叫人和应叫人,也适合于对手!

也许您认为那将是一件非常复杂和困难的事情,

但确有许多桥手无视这一黄金法则。

0

#2 User is offline   f9727009 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 50
  • Joined: 2011-January-16

Posted 2012-July-08, 04:06

bridge winners上正好在讨论二盖一中开叫人再叫自己的花色保证什么,一般性的共识是什么也不保证。

参见:http://bridgewinners.com/article/view/rebidding-2m-after-a-21-response/

Phillip Martin: "One of the arguments originally advanced for playing five-card majors was, “You'll never have a rebid problem after a two-over-one. You can always just rebid your suit if you have to.” So it's amusing that we're now back to having rebid problems again. Maybe we should try playing six-card majors."
0

#3 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2012-July-08, 04:57

Hi,你这种说法很是混淆,更非你理解的那样。你好好看看依据不同的方式和约定,再叫开叫的花色,即使是5张花色的再叫也常常赋予了一些更多的描述性含义。这在BBO转播的世界大赛上常见的,也是提醒的。
0

#4 User is offline   f9727009 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 50
  • Joined: 2011-January-16

Posted 2012-July-08, 05:31

View Postlycier, on 2012-July-08, 04:57, said:

Hi,你这种说法很是混淆,更非你理解的那样。你好好看看依据不同的方式和约定,再叫开叫的花色,即使是5张花色的再叫也常常赋予了一些更多的描述性含义。这在BBO转播的世界大赛上常见的,也是提醒的。


Bridge Winners上面投票的可不是中国人噢(虽然我也投了一票),绝大部分认为不保证六个。

我没看到过提醒的,如果有,请提供例子,谢谢。
0

#5 User is offline   yin970902 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 303
  • Joined: 2012-May-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chengdu

Posted 2012-July-08, 17:13

我赞成也在使用
一个花色不能再叫第2次,除非至少有六张!
这条规则。有很多叫品可以选择,为何要叫第2次,?那么在该套上一定有额外实力的!
同时,规则总是被打破的,比如持
T87 AKJ73 A8 J72
在1-2或1-2的进程下,我的再叫将考虑2而不是其他的。
上善若水,厚德载物
Believe, insist on, Thanksgiving
0

#6 User is offline   AKQJ2008 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 59
  • Joined: 2012-June-20

Posted 2012-August-05, 08:10

我是决然不敢违背这一法则的!如果在什么地方见到有人这样做了:)那么这位高手一定是遇到什么世界性难题!期待一见啊
0

#7 User is offline   f9727009 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 50
  • Joined: 2011-January-16

Posted 2012-August-05, 22:01

不是都喜欢洋专家吗?bridgewinners上面可都是洋专家,共识就是不保证六张。
0

#8 User is offline   madongjun 

  • China
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,724
  • Joined: 2012-August-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:taiyuan/shanxi/China
  • Interests:Economics、sports

Posted 2012-August-07, 00:50

我觉得更准确的说法是:不能连续叫一个花色两次,除非六张(以上)。若中间已经叫过其他叫品,则这在此限。
0

#9 User is offline   wenyin 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 102
  • Joined: 2012-June-12
  • Gender:Female

Posted 2012-November-17, 17:26

View Postyin970902, on 2012-July-08, 17:13, said:

我赞成也在使用
一个花色不能再叫第2次,除非至少有六张!
这条规则。有很多叫品可以选择,为何要叫第2次,?那么在该套上一定有额外实力的!
同时,规则总是被打破的,比如持
T87 AKJ73 A8 J72
在1-2或1-2的进程下,我的再叫将考虑2而不是其他的。

确实如此,对于搭档的2C或者2D你不得不应,诸如本例,你没有资格叫2NT,所以不得不再叫2H,这并不表示你一定有6张。
这样的牌例在实战中并不少见,那么就是说:规则总是被打破的,有些时候你不可以墨守成规,必须根据手中的牌做出合适的选择。
0

#10 User is offline   madongjun 

  • China
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,724
  • Joined: 2012-August-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:taiyuan/shanxi/China
  • Interests:Economics、sports

Posted 2012-November-18, 23:46

这是基本的定律,但不是公理,所以,绝大多数情况下必须遵守。极个别情况不遵守,也是权宜之计,但要保证在同伴认为你是6张的情况下,不会有大的损失发生。
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users