A8 J10632 - AJ10732
Vulnerable against not. IMPs.
1♠ (3♦)
What would you do playing standard methods?
If you know that partner can't be 10-13 with hearts, does it change your action? (One possibly relevant consequence of this agreement: if you double and he bids 3♥, that is expected to be a 3-card suit.)
Page 1 of 1
Canape?
#1
Posted 2012-December-09, 16:57
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#2
Posted 2012-December-09, 17:14
Let's see where 3♥ takes this auction.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#3
Posted 2012-December-10, 04:51
4♣
Introducing your best suit with a good hand in a cramped auction can not be far wrong.
It is psychologically interesting why people always find excuses to do something else,
Unless partner can introduce hearts I am not very interested in hearts, though I will bid 4♥ over 4♦.
If partner can support clubs the sky maybe the limit.
Rainer Herrmann
Introducing your best suit with a good hand in a cramped auction can not be far wrong.
It is psychologically interesting why people always find excuses to do something else,
Unless partner can introduce hearts I am not very interested in hearts, though I will bid 4♥ over 4♦.
If partner can support clubs the sky maybe the limit.
Rainer Herrmann
#4
Posted 2012-December-10, 04:58
on a 5-6 when the suit quality is on the 6 carder and I can't bid the 5 card suit at the 1 level I prefer to treat the hand as 4-6. So I would double.
#5
Posted 2012-December-10, 06:17
Double. I'm passing 3NT, raising 3♥ and 3♠ to four, and looking for slam over 4♣ or 4♥.
It's not that risky - if partner passes it could be the right spot and is unlikely to make. And +100 or +300 can be a winning board even when we have game on, since it may not be easy to reach the right game should we choose another action. For instance, 4♣ makes it difficult to get to 4♥ and impossible to get to 3NT.
And yes, the fact that 3♥ from partner over a double suggests a minimum with three hearts does influence my answer.
It's not that risky - if partner passes it could be the right spot and is unlikely to make. And +100 or +300 can be a winning board even when we have game on, since it may not be easy to reach the right game should we choose another action. For instance, 4♣ makes it difficult to get to 4♥ and impossible to get to 3NT.
And yes, the fact that 3♥ from partner over a double suggests a minimum with three hearts does influence my answer.
Page 1 of 1

Help
