Page 1 of 1
What is standard playing 2/1 with strong nt
#2
Posted 2013-January-21, 23:37
It never occurred to me that I could give two answers in the poll, since they are exclusive of one another. But, Adam managed to do it. Am not sure how one bid can show a stopper and be ambiguous about it at the same time. My choice would be that it shows one, but if I accidentally don't have it, oh well.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#5
Posted 2013-January-22, 04:45
Indeed you are supposed to have a heart stopper, but sometimes you don't really have one yet every other bid is worse...
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#7
Posted 2013-January-22, 08:28
something around 19 balanced depending on the rest of the system, 3+ hearts is all I can say regarding stoppers and even that it is not always true.
#8
Posted 2013-January-22, 10:37
Compliments to Mbodell, who is far from a N/B. (We see your results in big events sneaking up toward the top.)
More Forum members should initiate threads for the benefit of newer members, not necessarily themselves.
More Forum members should initiate threads for the benefit of newer members, not necessarily themselves.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#9
Posted 2013-January-22, 19:09
aguahombre, on 2013-January-22, 10:37, said:
Compliments to Mbodell, who is far from a N/B. (We see your results in big events sneaking up toward the top.)
More Forum members should initiate threads for the benefit of newer members, not necessarily themselves.
More Forum members should initiate threads for the benefit of newer members, not necessarily themselves.
Thanks for the kind words, but this was also for my benefit. I knew with 100% certainty what 1nt meant with 1♣-P-P-1♥-1nt but had heard conflicting things about 1♣-1♥-P-P-1nt and ended up believing the non-standard meaning and thus bid it with a 4432 pattern good 13 count with AKJ of hearts and ended up in a bad 3nt when partner raised to 3nt with her 8 count. This was not a good result. So it is good to get clear confirmation on what the bid should mean and correct a clear mistake of mine.
#10
Posted 2013-January-22, 20:27
aguahombre, on 2013-January-21, 23:37, said:
It never occurred to me that I could give two answers in the poll, since they are exclusive of one another. But, Adam managed to do it. Am not sure how one bid can show a stopper and be ambiguous about it at the same time. My choice would be that it shows one, but if I accidentally don't have it, oh well.
I'm not usually going to pass 1M out when I hold 18-19 balanced. Without a stopper, there are a number of options including:
(1) Bidding 1♠ on a four-card suit (I could do this even with a stopper)
(2) Doubling for takeout with approximately the right shape
(3) Rebidding a good five-card minor suit
(4) Rebidding 2♣ after opening 1♦ with 4/4 in the minors
(5) Bidding 1NT despite the lack of stopper
Which of these I pick will depend quite a bit on shape and value location and even vulnerability and form of scoring. But I wouldn't say the 1NT bid 100% guarantees a stopper, even though I'd often pick one of those other options without.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
Page 1 of 1