BBO Discussion Forums: Yes, these cards are from the same deck - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Yes, these cards are from the same deck and a CWNN hand?

#1 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-April-12, 16:30

Bid this grand slam - as you might imagine, West couldn't quite believe he was playing with the same deck when East overcalled 1S:



And today's bonus question:



Is that the ideal Convention With No Name hand? (4D showing 4-6 in the reds and game values)

ahydra
0

#2 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,214
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2013-April-12, 17:09

1.

1-1-2-4(optional voidwood)
4(minimum, our overcalls are sound)-4N(still voidwood)
5(1/4)-5(Q?)
6(yes and K)-6(I have K or Q diamonds, do you have the other)
7 no, but it looks like no losers if you're prepared to ask for this opposite what I've said was a minimum overcall

2.

I would probably slightly overbid, my choices are to GF agreeing hearts and show a stiff spade via an artificial 2N, or to bid 4 showing this sort of hand (10-15, big fit, often 6-5 if lower end)
0

#3 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2013-April-13, 01:00

 ahydra, on 2013-April-12, 16:30, said:




Is that the ideal Convention With No Name hand? (4D showing 4-6 in the reds and game values)


I would expect better diamonds.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#4 User is offline   chasetb 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 879
  • Joined: 2009-December-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk, backwater USA

Posted 2013-April-13, 01:24

I agree that with hand #2 posted, you can't use 4 as a rebid because you are missing both top Diamond honors. You must have at least two of the top three, and three of the top five of your minor, and at least 5 HCP in the Major. Also, only in the sequence 1-1, do I not expect 4 to have any outside Aces or Kings. In any other 1m - 1M ; 4m sequence, you have at least one in-between bid to show slam interest.
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."

"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."

"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."

-Alfred Sheinwold
0

#5 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-April-14, 03:34

Our auction on the first board was... well, interesting.



Partner thought 3H was asking a stop, not showing a good spade raise. Spades split 1-1 and clubs 3-3, so I made eight tricks :) At the other table our team-mates bid up to 5H and stopped them finding the slam, so it was just 14 IMPs out rather than 20.

After I make some slam-going interest, I think partner's hand is HUGE. AK together with the diamond singleton look awesome. What might have been better is if I splintered in hearts instead so that partner also knows his xxx is not a problem.

And as for this one:


partner decided to splinter with 3S. Is that an overbid? I think so and would bid 4H, but 4H could also be a balanced 18-count. We did at one point discuss possible artificial 2NT heart raises in this sequence, perhaps we need to revisit those.

My hand was AQxx Jxxx Ax Kxx so I wasn't stopping short of slam after 3S. The slam is just over 50% so not ideal for teams, particularly when hearts split 4-1 with Q109x on my left and the K is offside as well :(

ahydra
0

#6 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2013-April-14, 04:26

 ahydra, on 2013-April-14, 03:34, said:

Partner thought 3H was asking a stop, not showing a good spade raise.

OMG! :o
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#7 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,198
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2013-April-14, 06:54

 Free, on 2013-April-14, 04:26, said:

OMG! :o

Is that really ridicolous? For most, 3 would be nf. What else could W do with a hand that wanted to bid a forcing 3? Maybe it is best to play this a spades raise and don't worry about the strong hands with one minor, as those are very infrequent on this auction. But I think that W has to take his share of the blame when he made a possibly confusing 3 bid, when a splinter bid seems obvious. Still, I am not sure if E would move over a splinter. W would probably have to move beyond 4 to reach slam.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
1

#8 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-April-15, 03:00

Hand 2 the diamonds are too soft for 4, partner should expect to run at least 5 tricks quickly (perhaps after a ruff) when he holds K or ace.

I think splinter is fine, the hand is too good for a 4 drive (weak 6-4 for me)
0

#9 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,250
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-April-15, 08:58

#2 No. 3S - splinter, 4D should show a suit that playes for at most 1 looser, ideally,
you even restrict the bid to showing 5422 shape
#1 I have no idea, if we reach 7S
I will bid 4H, followed by 5D, we may end up in 6S /or in 7S.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#10 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2013-April-15, 11:23

On hand 1, west confused the issue by trying to show a good raise. Did he really intend to stop below game? I much prefer to splinter 4 and I like my hand so much that I'll force the issue with a 5 cue afterwards.

Hmm..opps have only 13 HCP and opened and raised ...welcome to modern bridge.

.. neilkaz ..
0

#11 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,429
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2013-April-15, 12:28

Having said that, they've bid-and-raised , and kept schtum over 3, never mind 4, with 10 between 'em.
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#12 User is offline   mikl_plkcc 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 321
  • Joined: 2008-November-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:sailing, bridge

Posted 2013-April-19, 10:21

(1) - 1 - (2)
3 - (4) - / - (/)
5 - (/) - 6 - (/)
6 - (/) - 6 - (/)
/ - (//)

The grand slam has been preempted out by the 4 bid.

If they are not aggressive enough,
(1) - 1 - (2)
3 - (/) - 3 - (/)
4 - (/) - 5 - (/)
5 - (/) - 6 - (/)
7 - (/) - / - (//)
0

#13 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-April-19, 12:02

 mikl_plkcc, on 2013-April-19, 10:21, said:

(1) - 1 - (2)
3 - (4) - / - (/)
5 - (/) - 6 - (/)
6 - (/) - 6 - (/)
/ - (//)


I think if West offers up a 6 bid rather than just bidding 6, East should take the plunge into seven. He has AK and a diamond singleton - if partner's trying for grand, he surely holds the Ace.

ahydra
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users