Any blame?
Page 1 of 1
ATB - Wrong Game x QJ Ax AQJT9xxx
#1
Posted 2013-August-19, 05:31
R/W, Teams
Any blame?
Any blame?
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
#4
Posted 2013-August-19, 06:13
I think I'd be more likely to play 4♠ than 3N if I didn't play 5♣ and not sure I make that.
#5
Posted 2013-August-19, 06:19
mr1303, on 2013-August-19, 05:38, said:
North, for not opening the automatic weak 2 in spades.
I hope you wouldn't double from East! ugh.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#6
Posted 2013-August-19, 06:24
gwnn, on 2013-August-19, 06:19, said:
I hope you wouldn't double from East! ugh.
Surprise surprise, the auction from our teammates table: 2♠ - Dbl - AP. -800. Lose 14.
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
#7
Posted 2013-August-19, 07:00
South, for leading ♥A and another?
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
-gwnn
#8
Posted 2013-August-19, 07:00
I see not blame really. There were a few factors that created problems. N did not open a weak 2 in first, ( i happen to like that) S did not show a 2 suited hand over 1C, difficult not to stress that S suit with those second round red suit controls. Once S bid D should W bid 3H, perhaps, difficult hand I think.
#10
Posted 2013-August-19, 08:47
While 5c is unlucky to get set the sole blame for this debacle goes to west.
West failed to realize the quality of their spade suit and as a consequence
they raised clubs instead of further insisting on spades with a 4s bid (which
allows for a higher scoring and 1 level lower contract). The suit quality of
the spades is just short of being a 1 loser max opposite a void that is one
powerful suit and should almost always be trumps.
West failed to realize the quality of their spade suit and as a consequence
they raised clubs instead of further insisting on spades with a 4s bid (which
allows for a higher scoring and 1 level lower contract). The suit quality of
the spades is just short of being a 1 loser max opposite a void that is one
powerful suit and should almost always be trumps.
#11
Posted 2013-August-19, 09:22
I guess west could consider 3NT over 3♦, on the grounds that (1) he has both red kings (2) partner has jumped and is likely to hold a value or two in the reds as well (3) presumably he already promised 5 spades by bidding 1♠ instead of double.
Still wouldn't call it blame though.
Still wouldn't call it blame though.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
-gwnn
#12
Posted 2013-August-21, 09:20
Cyberyeti, on 2013-August-19, 07:03, said:
We get out to 3♦ over a double and now you can try to find a making game, if you find 3N, 4♦ will be bid.
I think my team mate deigned it wise not to pull in view of the vulnerability. I take it you would bid 3♦ as South over 2♠ - (Dbl) then?
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
Page 1 of 1