BBO Discussion Forums: After 2NT opening, wrong bid description - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

After 2NT opening, wrong bid description

#1 User is offline   DGoldfarb 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 2013-November-12

Posted 2014-August-24, 17:47

This was hand #22 in the $1 Robot Reward #8910 today (8/24/2014).


Notice that the 4 bid is given the explanation of being 9+ points and the A: I knew GIB didn't have the A, but I figured it did have slam interest. Clearly GIB intended the bid as a retransfer. The explanation on this auction needs to be changed. Naturally if I'd known it was a retransfer, I wouldn't have gone to the 5 level.
0

#2 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2014-August-24, 19:27

I am not sure that 4 should be sign off If 4 shows A with 9 TP.
0

#3 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2014-August-24, 20:11

No, Lycier... you misunderstand (or don't believe) the original post. The description of 4 is incorrect; North fully intended 4 to be a re-transfer to hearts, so that North can then decide whether to end the auction in 4 (which he would obviously do with 1 HCP) or to continue if he wants to investigate slam. GIB does this over a super-acceptance after a 1NT opening also.
0

#4 User is offline   georgi 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 1,317
  • Joined: 2007-December-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 2014-August-26, 07:15

Thanks for reporting.

Fixed in v31.

The GIB's idea was re-transfer. just crossed with slam rules explanations.

Real meaning is now : !Retransfer -- 5+ !H

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users