BBO Discussion Forums: 1m-1M rebid - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 4 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1m-1M rebid

#1 User is offline   lmilne 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 2009-October-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 2015-January-28, 23:14



Two or three?

What is the smallest change you would have to make to the hand to change you into the other category?
2

#2 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2015-January-29, 00:27

2
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
1

#3 User is offline   wanoff 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: 2012-February-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham,UK

Posted 2015-January-29, 04:05

2♦ stinks, 3♦ is possible
1nt 15-17 ?
0

#4 User is offline   NickRW 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,951
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sussex, England

Posted 2015-January-29, 05:14

Toughie. Either could work out on a particular deal. 3 is right on playing strength, but p could well put us in 3N with little play. I'd be happier with

xx
KQ
AQJTxxx
Kx

i.e. improve my suit a little and put the KQ tight where I have reasonable expectation they're pulling weight.
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
0

#5 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-January-29, 07:51

Two for me. Fine suit, but low on defense, no shortness, nothing in partner's suit, and KQ tight is a minus.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2015-January-29, 08:22

View Postwanoff, on 2015-January-29, 04:05, said:

2♦ stinks, 3♦ is possible
1nt 15-17 ?

This is a trifecta. Not the good kind, IMO.

Easy to choose the 2D rebid. The LTC is misleading as a guide here. Partner needs the Diamond ace or a game-force in his own right for us to have a sniff at game in NT.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2015-January-29, 10:39

I want ♦A to have a shot at running for no losers

so

♠KQ
♥xx
♦AQJ10xxx
♣Qx

would be 3♦ for me.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
1

#8 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2015-January-29, 11:47

3♦ is canonical.
0

#9 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2015-January-29, 12:12

Is this really an expert topic?
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#10 User is offline   lmilne 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 2009-October-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 2015-January-30, 05:14

View PostVampyr, on 2015-January-29, 12:12, said:

Is this really an expert topic?


So far I'm 50/50 with the top players in my country, with two players whose names you would recognize taking opposite sides.

Would love to hear your thoughts (and which side you take).
0

#11 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2015-January-30, 12:49

Two please.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#12 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2015-January-30, 13:46

The credential committee granted the OP full rights to post in the "expert" forum after his result in the World Pairs final in Sanya (they had apparently ignored earlier Australian national titles as "irrelevant" ;)).

Anyway, I bid 2♦. I don't really agree with playing-strength based jump rebids when you need so much for game.
7

#13 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2015-January-30, 16:48

View Postlmilne, on 2015-January-28, 23:14, said:



Two or three?

What is the smallest change you would have to make to the hand to change you into the other category?


2d 5d a long way off and if p cannot move over 2d odds of game are exceedingly thin. Smallest change for
3d for me change the KQ Kx into Ax Ax
0

#14 User is offline   lhlyr123 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 2012-July-21

Posted 2015-January-31, 00:07

2D，一副没有快速赢墩的牌，需要同伴更多的支持才能成局。这是一副有足够赢墩的牌。也是敌方容易犯防守错误的牌。但我更愿意让同伴保持对我的叫牌有信心。
0

#15 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2015-January-31, 00:52

View Postlhlyr123, on 2015-January-31, 00:07, said:

2D，一副没有快速赢墩的牌，需要同伴更多的支持才能成局。这是一副有足够赢墩的牌。也是敌方容易犯防守错误的牌。但我更愿意让同伴保持对我的叫牌有信心。

Too bad I can't read Chinese (or whatever it is), but I agree with the conclusion ;)
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
1

#16 User is offline   Mbodell 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,871
  • Joined: 2007-April-22
  • Location:Santa Clara, CA

Posted 2015-January-31, 01:27

View PostFree, on 2015-January-31, 00:52, said:

Too bad I can't read Chinese (or whatever it is), but I agree with the conclusion ;)


Google translates it as: A no quick tricks cards, need more support to peer into the office. This is a card has enough tricks. The enemy is easy to make a defensive mistake cards. But I prefer to let my fellow maintain bid with confidence
0

#17 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2015-January-31, 04:27

And to make it a 3♦ rebid, you would have to change the club king to the ace. Then you are far more likely to make 3NT with 9 fast tricks opposite two red aces, for instance.
0

#18 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2015-January-31, 04:40

View Postlmilne, on 2015-January-28, 23:14, said:


Two or three?
What is the smallest change you would have to make to the hand to change you into the other category?
1N (if 15-17) = 10. 3♦ = 9. 2♦ = 8. 2♣ = 6. 1♠ = 5. IMO wanoff is right that, with 7.5 playing tricks, 2♦ is a bit pathetic and deserves
  • to miss a reasonable game -- or
  • to have opponents successfully compete in a black suit.

I disagree with Vampyr: IMO, bidding problems are usually appreciated by both beginners and experts; it's probably wise to have a Beginner forum for the few posters capable of realistic self-assessment; but otherwise it would be easier to navigate orthogonal categories that include Bidding problems, Play problems, and System discussion.
Guthrie.tech
0

#19 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2015-January-31, 06:07

View PostPhilKing, on 2015-January-31, 04:27, said:

And to make it a 3♦ rebid, you would have to change the club king to the ace. Then you are far more likely to make 3NT with 9 fast tricks opposite two red aces, for instance.


Lack of aces is probably the only reason to be conservative about this hand. While it might work out just fine, I know so little about partner's hand that I'm not going to risk making what, by most standards, is an underbid.

Still, it's a very nice hand for a sim.
0

#20 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2015-January-31, 06:35

The scale of Nigel keeps surprising me, this time it looks like a Gauss curve with the top at 8...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0
  • 4 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users