BBO Discussion Forums: 8-card Club - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

8-card Club hand evaluation

#1 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2015-February-08, 04:14

IMPs; teams

Do you agree with the bidding of this hand? :
- 2♣:
2♣ followed by 3♣ is GF;
A direct jump to 3♣ would be 6c♣ with invite values.
5♣ would be to play

3♦ of partner was 4th suit, asking more info.
4♣ denies a ♦-stop, and probably denies 2c♠, 3c♥; 5♣ instead of 4♣ would have been minimal values
http://bss2html.atspace.cc/
0

#2 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-February-08, 06:24

Yes.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#3 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,250
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-February-08, 12:43

The auction is ok, except if 5C instead of 4C showes min value,
why dont you bid this?

You have min. values for a game force.
If partner needs 2KC+Q for the slam, he can assume those.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#4 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2015-February-09, 02:56

Thank you for the replies.
I added partners hand in the diagram below

View Postkgr, on 2015-February-08, 04:14, said:

IMPs; teams

Do you agree with the bidding of this hand? :
- 2♣:
2♣ followed by 3♣ is GF;
A direct jump to 3♣ would be 6c♣ with invite values.
5♣ would be to play

3♦ of partner was 4th suit, asking more info.
4♣ denies a ♦-stop, and probably denies 2c♠, 3c♥; 5♣ instead of 4♣ would have been minimal values

It is clear for North to continue to six with the singleton Club?
http://bss2html.atspace.cc/
0

#5 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,826
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-February-09, 03:58

100% agree up to 4c

at this point your options are 5c or 6c.

no blame after this point
0

#6 User is offline   rhm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,092
  • Joined: 2005-June-27

Posted 2015-February-09, 04:11

View Postkgr, on 2015-February-09, 02:56, said:

I added partners hand in the diagram below

Yet another case where 4♣ minorwood would be helpful.

Quote

It is clear for North to continue to six with the singleton Club?

The singleton was an ace and as I understand 3♣ in context shows a powerful suit interested in a club slam.
If South required genuine club support he would have rebid 2NT (or perhaps 3♦) not 3♣ at least the way I play 2/1.
Over 3♦ South denied either values in diamonds by refusing to bid 3NT or he must have a huge hand.
He also denied interest in the majors. Where are South values to force to game?
Does North really expect two losers in clubs?

Rainer Herrmann
0

#7 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2015-February-09, 06:31

After showing clubs and gf hand via 3♣, I would just bid 5♣ over 3♦.

There are too many things to learn by asking to opener, and there are too many things that can go wrong during this process. It is better to try to give an idea of my hand to pd imho.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#8 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2015-February-09, 11:12

View Postrhm, on 2015-February-09, 04:11, said:

Yet another case where 4♣ minorwood would be helpful.

Meh, Kickback Turbo is better B-)

Btw, partner should bid 6 imo, he never showed any extras (or did he?) and he has 3 Aces. What more does he need?
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#9 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2015-February-09, 11:16

of course north has to bid slam. south has overbid if anything.
0

#10 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2015-February-09, 11:23

View PostFree, on 2015-February-09, 11:12, said:

Meh, Kickback Turbo is better B-)

Btw, partner should bid 6 imo, he never showed any extras (or did he?) and he has 3 Aces. What more does he need?

4♠ showed extras
http://bss2html.atspace.cc/
0

#11 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,696
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2015-February-09, 11:41

View Postrhm, on 2015-February-09, 04:11, said:

Yet another case where 4♣ minorwood would be helpful.

North shows 2 without the club queen. Over to you.
(-: Zel :-)
1

#12 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2015-February-09, 11:43

View Postkgr, on 2015-February-09, 11:23, said:

4♠ showed extras

Why?
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#13 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2015-February-09, 11:43

View Postkgr, on 2015-February-09, 11:23, said:

4♠ showed extras

Why?
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#14 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2015-February-09, 13:19

View PostFree, on 2015-February-09, 11:43, said:

Why?

Ok, maybe not. sorry.
http://bss2html.atspace.cc/
0

#15 User is offline   rhm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,092
  • Joined: 2005-June-27

Posted 2015-February-09, 14:42

View PostZelandakh, on 2015-February-09, 11:41, said:

North shows 2 without the club queen. Over to you.

5♣
Frankly that looks easy to me.
It might go down on a diamond lead or it could possibly make an overtrick, but we can not stop below game anyway.
What I know is that opposite 3 aces I want to be in slam and otherwise, since I am in a game forcing situation, I do not want to play anything but game in clubs.

Rainer Herrmann
0

#16 User is offline   Lovera 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,743
  • Joined: 2014-January-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bari (ITALIA)
  • Interests:I'm also on YOUTUBE with a channel of music songs .

Posted 2015-March-29, 10:07

View PostFree, on 2015-February-09, 11:12, said:

Meh, Kickback Turbo is better B-)

Btw, partner should bid 6 imo, he never showed any extras (or did he?) and he has 3 Aces. What more does he need?

Probably of 8th club of S (that doesn't know p has K of heart).
0

#17 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,512
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2015-March-30, 07:13

N was hoping you would guess he had a club even? He continued bidding 4S for what reason and should shoot 6C.
1

#18 User is offline   Lovera 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,743
  • Joined: 2014-January-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bari (ITALIA)
  • Interests:I'm also on YOUTUBE with a channel of music songs .

Posted 2015-March-30, 07:23

However i think there is a way to escape off of this situation: before 5♣ bidding, having partner show two Aces by cue bid, doesn't cost anything to bid 4NT because now partner with 0 Ace bids 5♣ (for pass) otherwise you gets to slam ,having the rest of information (=partner has shown only 2 Aces over 3) in this (indirect) way.
0

#19 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-April-09, 03:57

Oh dear, I disagree quite a lot with some of the posts in this thread.
Yes, I agree that minorwood is an improvement over awful slam bidding. But it's not nearly as good as good slam bidding! I just don't agree that you should give up on finding slam opposite a hand with two keycards and extras.
Meanwhile, if you play all cues as mandatory over 4C, then you might as well play minorwood - you aren't going to find out if partner has extras anyway.

I am not sure I like jumping to 5C either - at least, we will never get to slam off two diamond tricks by bidding 4C. Switch the pointed suits, and you could talk me into it.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
1

#20 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2015-April-09, 11:32

View Postkgr, on 2015-February-08, 04:14, said:


IMPs; teams
Do you agree with the bidding of this hand? :
2♣ followed by 3♣ is GF;
A direct jump to 3♣ would be 6c♣ with invite values.
5♣ would be to play
3♦ of partner was 4th suit, asking more info.
4♣ denies a ♦-stop, and probably denies 2c♠, 3c♥; 5♣ instead of 4♣ would have been minimal values
I like the auction until 5♣ but now, I agree with Wank that North should try one for the road.
Guthrie.tech
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users