BBO Discussion Forums: First time to see such explanations - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

First time to see such explanations

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2015-April-19, 01:39



4 says " strong two suiter - 4-losers ".
If rebidding 5 promises less than 4 losers,it is very easy to raise to slam.
0

#2 User is offline   1eyedjack 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,575
  • Joined: 2004-March-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2015-April-19, 01:55

It doesn't show fewer than 4 losers. It shows fewer than 5 losers, which is a weaker hand.

I don't think that it is ever easy to bid slam on the basis of losing trick count. As an evaluation method its accuracy shines at the 2 - 4 level, where the precise location of losers tends to be less relevant as aspects that reinforce the potential of the hand and those which detract have a good chance of cancelling out.

It may still be right for GIB to bid slam on this hand, on balance of probabilities, but I would not call it easy.
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.

Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. mPosted ImagesPosted ImagetPosted Imager-mPosted ImagendPosted Imageing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.

"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"

"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
0

#3 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2015-April-19, 09:06

View Post1eyedjack, on 2015-April-19, 01:55, said:

It may still be right for GIB to bid slam on this hand, on balance of probabilities, but I would not call it easy.

We don't know whether GIB would do it, sitting West.

But, I agree with Jack that the slam bid isn't clear; you could easily have had two spade losers off the top.
0

#4 User is offline   georgi 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 1,317
  • Joined: 2007-December-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 2015-April-20, 16:27

View PostBbradley62, on 2015-April-19, 09:06, said:

We don't know whether GIB would do it, sitting West.

But, I agree with Jack that the slam bid isn't clear; you could easily have had two spade losers off the top.


GIB sitting West would pass on 5

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users