Posted 2015-May-18, 20:32
Actually there is a little more to it. If you play A of ♥ you are planning to take ♠ finesse. Let's see possible spade breaks
Kxx-void-->%11
Kx-x --->%26
K-xx --->%13
Void-Kxx--->%11
x-Kx---------->%26
xx-K----------->%13
Assume you took ♥ finesse and it won, you are in good shape.
Assume you took ♥ finesse and lost, you are still in good shape when K of spades is singleton on either side.
Playing the A and taking spade finesse wins only when spade K is on and not stiff (with stiff on, other line also wins, note that other line wins also when K is off side stiff) The success of this line totally depends on where the spade K is and that it is not singleton. Finessing ♥ depends on where the ♥K is + some more.
I think taking the ♥ finesse is better w/o the analysis of the lead. I think this will come down to how likely the J of ♥ is from KJT.
At the table I would take ♥ finesse and when it does not succeed, I try to go dummy with a club ruff for the spade finesse. If opponents do not cooperate and shift to diamonds in a fashion that i can not use ♦ J as an entry and making me face a diamond ruff danger, then I would just cash ♠A.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
West leads ♥J, playing "standard" leads.
Do you call for ♥Q?
It's IMPs.
Is it closer than 13%?