BBO Discussion Forums: This is not a complete definition - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

This is not a complete definition

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2016-May-10, 13:57



We know 2♠ should be 4-card ♠ with 9hcp to invite, but 2♠ only says "9hcp" in this hand, so this is not a complete definition.
1

#2 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2016-May-10, 18:55

Of course, this is not a new topic either:
http://www.bridgebas...__1#entry872123
0

#3 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2016-May-10, 19:07

Oh, yes, this issue should be in Gib version 34.
And the answer from Stephen Tu in your link should be standard.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users