BBO Discussion Forums: Diamonds Are Forever - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Sign In »
Sign in with your BBO User/Password
or Register via BBO Register Now!

Help

View New Content

Page 1 of 1

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

Diamonds Are Forever

#1 lamford

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 6,445
Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-April-07, 20:46

Your go. Camrose (a strong international event).

I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#2 nige1

5-level belongs to me

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 9,128
Joined: 2004-August-30
Gender:Male
Location:Glasgow Scotland
Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2017-April-08, 02:04

lamford, on 2017-April-07, 20:46, said:

Your go. Camrose (a strong international event).

Assuming no special agreements, I rank

2♦ = NAT. Constructive.
3♦ = NAT. PRE. Timid but allowing room for partner to bid 3N.
5♦ = NAT. PRE. Prefer this to 4♦.
4♦ = NAT. PRE. 4 and 5 level pre-empts remove 3N as a possibility.
Double = T/O. A distortion.
3♠ = ART. Asking for a ♠ stop. A bid weird because it usually implies a good hand with a solid suit.
PSYCHs.

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#3 rhm

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,092
Joined: 2005-June-27

Posted 2017-April-08, 03:58

I am a strong believer that you should resolve such close distributional decisions in favor of overbidding.
There is much more to loose by going low than high.
Going high allows for better information exchange regarding strain and level.
Partner could have a minimum hand with diamond support and a void in cubs, say ♠QJxxxx ♥QJxx ♦Axx ♣-
Bid 2♦ and if that is forcing to game so be it. This one is not even close
Believe me, even if game has no chance, you will rarely get doubled when your bidding is unlimited.

Rainer Herrmann

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#4 sfi

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,576
Joined: 2009-May-18
Location:Oz

Posted 2017-April-08, 05:08

nige1, on 2017-April-08, 02:04, said:

Assuming no special agreements...

One special agreement is that you don't get to double partner's opening. That might change your choices.

Anything but 2D just seems odd.

1

Back to top of the page up there ^

#5 SteveMoe

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,168
Joined: 2012-May-17
Gender:Male
Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge

Posted 2017-April-08, 08:14

A good argument for 1M - 3m to be invitational (and non-fitting). Think 10 to 12 minus and 0-2 M cards. Better use than preempt (wrong sides hands). Unencumbers forcing NT.

Absent that tool, 2♦ looks better than 1N for reasons stated upthread.

Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#6 Phil

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 10,092
Joined: 2008-December-11
Gender:Male
Location:North Texas, USA
Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2017-April-08, 10:46

Even if I played 1M 3x as invitational this hand is simply too good.

Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.

1

Back to top of the page up there ^

#7 neilkaz

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,568
Joined: 2006-June-28
Gender:Male
Location:Barrington IL USA
Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2017-April-08, 10:48

Why wouldn't one bid 2♦?

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#8 nige1

5-level belongs to me

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 9,128
Joined: 2004-August-30
Gender:Male
Location:Glasgow Scotland
Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2017-April-08, 12:42

sfi, on 2017-April-08, 05:08, said:

One special agreement is that you don't get to double partner's opening. That might change your choices. Anything but 2D just seems odd.

I misread the problem

I agree with sfi's 2♦

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#9 lamford

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 6,445
Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-April-08, 15:26

sfi, on 2017-April-08, 05:08, said:

One special agreement is that you don't get to double partner's opening. That might change your choices.

Is that what the Laws refer to as a "special partnership understanding"?

I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#10 sfi

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,576
Joined: 2009-May-18
Location:Oz

Posted 2017-April-08, 16:42

lamford, on 2017-April-08, 15:26, said:

Is that what the Laws refer to as a "special partnership understanding"?

Maybe the latest version of the laws is changing the game more than I thought ...

1

Back to top of the page up there ^

#11 lamford

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 6,445
Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-April-09, 04:55

At the table in this major international event, South bid 5D and North, with AJxxxx x Qx AKQx raised to the cold slam ... easy game bridge

I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#12 Cyberyeti

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 14,203
Joined: 2009-July-13
Location:England

Posted 2017-April-09, 05:21

lamford, on 2017-April-09, 04:55, said:

At the table in this major international event, South bid 5D and North, with AJxxx x Qx AKQx raised to the cold slam ... easy game bridge

Did he fail to notice he only had 12 cards ?

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#13 rhm

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,092
Joined: 2005-June-27

Posted 2017-April-09, 06:00

lamford, on 2017-April-09, 04:55, said:

At the table in this major international event, South bid 5D and North, with AJxxx x Qx AKQx raised to the cold slam ... easy game bridge

Yes, when you guess right it's an easy game.

Rainer Herrmann

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#14 lamford

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 6,445
Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-April-09, 11:34

Cyberyeti, on 2017-April-09, 05:21, said:

Did he fail to notice he only had 12 cards ?

Sorry, I find that he had AJxxxx spades

I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#15 rmnka447

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,366
Joined: 2012-March-18
Gender:Male
Location:Illinois
Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2017-April-09, 11:42

I'll start with 2 ♦ and keep rebidding ♦.

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#16 WellSpyder

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,627
Joined: 2009-November-30
Location:Oxfordshire, England

Posted 2017-April-10, 10:30

lamford, on 2017-April-09, 04:55, said:

At the table in this major international event, South bid 5D and North, with AJxxxx x Qx AKQx raised to the cold slam ... easy game bridge

I'm guessing this pair don't play exclusion key-card, then?

1

Back to top of the page up there ^

#17 mr1303

Admirer of Walter the Walrus

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,563
Joined: 2003-November-14
Gender:Male
Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2017-April-11, 06:55

I bid 2D. I expect my next bid is 3D. My bid after that will probably be 4D.

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#18 Dinarius

Group: Full Members
Posts: 274
Joined: 2015-February-11
Gender:Male
Location:Ireland

Posted 2017-April-18, 08:20

Agree with almost all of what has been said.

To me there isn't even a question.

I bid 2♦. Constructive and forcing.

D.

0

Back to top of the page up there ^

#19 aguahombre

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12,029
Joined: 2009-February-21
Gender:Male
Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2017-April-18, 23:04

nige1, on 2017-April-08, 12:42, said:

I misread the problem

I agree with sfi's 2♦

O.K., then I will agree with RHM's 2♦, since he said it first.

"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)

1

Back to top of the page up there ^

Page 1 of 1

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Time Now: 2024-Nov-11, 21:46

Community Forum Software by IP.Board 3.1.4