nullve, on 2017-August-31, 16:02, said:
So 2♣ over 1♦-1M/N is currently showing the intermediate 1-suiters w/ 6+ C? Then how about
1♦ = same as now but excluding "10-15, 1-suited w/ 6+ C" and including "11-15, 3-suited w/ short C" (makes 1♦ NAT)
...1M/N = same as now
......2♣ = "11-15, 3-suited w/ short C"
......other = same as now
...other = same as now
2♣ = "11-15, 3-suited w/ C" or "10-15, 1-suited w/ 6+ C"
...2♦ = relay (same as now?)
......2♥ = "11-15, 3-suited w/ H" (as in Roman Club, but guaranteeing C)
......2♠ = "11-15, 3-suited w/ short H" (as in Roman Club)
......2N/3♣ = 1-suiters w/ 6+ C (as in one Belladonna's 1986 version of Roman Club, but with "10-15" instead of "16-19")
...(...)
other = same as now (so 3♣ is PRE)
?
Should be GCC legal.
1♦ = same as now but excluding "10-15, 1-suited w/ 6+ C" and including "11-15, 3-suited w/ short C" (makes 1♦ NAT)
...1M/N = same as now
......2♣ = "11-15, 3-suited w/ short C"
......other = same as now
...other = same as now
2♣ = "11-15, 3-suited w/ C" or "10-15, 1-suited w/ 6+ C"
...2♦ = relay (same as now?)
......2♥ = "11-15, 3-suited w/ H" (as in Roman Club, but guaranteeing C)
......2♠ = "11-15, 3-suited w/ short H" (as in Roman Club)
......2N/3♣ = 1-suiters w/ 6+ C (as in one Belladonna's 1986 version of Roman Club, but with "10-15" instead of "16-19")
...(...)
other = same as now (so 3♣ is PRE)
?
Should be GCC legal.
Not too shabby.....of course solving one problem introduces another....our current responses to 2D over 2C ( 3 suited).are
2H...minimum with Hearts
2S,,,minimum, short in Hearts
2NT,3C,3D, and 3H are all maximums, submarining the shortness...
your suggestion seems workable as well and gives more to ponder.....Takk!!!