BBO Discussion Forums: length points and the Rule of 20 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2

length points and the Rule of 20

#21 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2018-September-24, 12:42

View Postnullve, on 2018-September-23, 16:19, said:

Isn't the (simple) LTC method equivalent to counting distributional points using the (Goren) 3-2-1 scale and then adding 1 point (the value of a doubleton) for each "cover card", i.e. each ace, non-singleton king or non-singleton, non-doubleton queen? :unsure:

Zelandakh has often made the point that the (M)LTC method is a terrible point count method in disguise. For example, here.


My point, if not expressed clearly, is that I'd never simple LTC by itself to decide to open a hand. It's more a qualitative measure for me to be considered with all the other pieces of information that go into adjusting hand evaluation. For example, the non-opener hand I posed (x KJ QJxxx QJxxx) is a 6 loser hand, but still not an opener.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2


Fast Reply

  

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users