BBO Discussion Forums: Brutal interference - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Brutal interference

Poll: Brutal interference (16 member(s) have cast votes)

Your call ?

  1. Pass (2 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  2. Double (11 votes [68.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 68.75%

  3. 4NT (please explain) (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  4. 5D (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 5H (2 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  6. Other (please explain) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is online   apollo1201 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,152
  • Joined: 2014-June-01

Posted 2021-May-07, 10:15

View Postpescetom, on 2021-May-07, 03:59, said:

Do you think it could be found legitimately?

In books. But they don’t lead small, they lead the 10 (signal the highest ranking suit).

In a friendly game or against friends, I’d happily risk it.

In a match / official competition, I hope I’d dare.

But in a reasonably qualitative field, I wouldnt be surprised that the lead is found at several tables.
0

#22 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,081
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2021-May-07, 11:25

View Postapollo1201, on 2021-May-07, 10:15, said:

In books. But they don’t lead small, they lead the 10 (signal the highest ranking suit).

In a friendly game or against friends, I’d happily risk it.

In a match / official competition, I hope I’d dare.

But in a reasonably qualitative field, I wouldnt be surprised that the lead is found at several tables.


Fair enough. I can see the opportunity and the logic, it just wouldn't occur to me to risk it at MP.
0

#23 User is offline   MinorKid 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 288
  • Joined: 2010-February-22
  • Location:Hong Kong, China
  • Interests:Physics<br>Play pool<br><br>Studying Precision System

Posted 2021-May-07, 19:01

I voted Pass as i felt we cant force to the five level. If opener has extras and bids on i felt we have a safe sound good slam.

It turned out to be wrong.
0

#24 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,288
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2021-May-07, 21:22

View PostMinorKid, on 2021-May-07, 19:01, said:

I voted Pass as i felt we cant force to the five level. If opener has extras and bids on i felt we have a safe sound good slam.

It turned out to be wrong.

I agree that this hand is quite iffy at the 5-level - partner could hold Qx, Kxxxxx, AQ, Jxxx. Pass, though, seems too unilateral.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users