BBO Discussion Forums: I don't have four hearts - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

I don't have four hearts Worth action?

#41 User is offline   JLOL 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,033
  • Joined: 2008-December-05

Posted 2009-May-21, 18:30

655321, on May 21 2009, 06:01 PM, said:

Hmm, my interpretation of the LOL is that "Partner certainly is a lot closer to acting than we were." is not a strong enough statement in favor of bidding.

i.e. North's double in fact is clearcut, but jdonn's statement could be read as saying that, while North is closer (than South) to having a bid, he still has a pass.

(LOL at us analyzing a LOL :))

Yeah seriously north had the most obvious bid ever, and south had a pass.

Sorry for lack of LOL clarity.
New website: http://www.justinlall.com
0

#42 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-May-21, 21:27

JLOL, on May 21 2009, 07:30 PM, said:

655321, on May 21 2009, 06:01 PM, said:

Hmm, my interpretation of the LOL is that "Partner certainly is a lot closer to acting than we were." is not a strong enough statement in favor of bidding.

i.e.  North's double in fact is clearcut, but jdonn's statement could be read as saying that, while North is closer (than South) to having a bid, he still has a pass.

(LOL at us analyzing a LOL :))

Yeah seriously north had the most obvious bid ever, and south had a pass.

Sorry for lack of LOL clarity.

I was hoping so, but you never know.

I think North has an obvious double, but I still think doubling with South is sick but that I'd do it anyway.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#43 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2009-May-22, 00:35

JLOL, on May 22 2009, 02:30 AM, said:

655321, on May 21 2009, 06:01 PM, said:

Hmm, my interpretation of the LOL is that "Partner certainly is a lot closer to acting than we were." is not a strong enough statement in favor of bidding.

i.e.  North's double in fact is clearcut, but jdonn's statement could be read as saying that, while North is closer (than South) to having a bid, he still has a pass.

(LOL at us analyzing a LOL :P)

Yeah seriously north had the most obvious bid ever, and south had a pass.

Sorry for lack of LOL clarity.

If I was qualified to LOL, I would never explain my LOL's.

So an unqulified LOL at explaining your LOL.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.

Gnasher
0

#44 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-May-22, 10:38

Fair enough, it was a much better LOL in the direction it was meant than in the opposite direction.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#45 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-May-22, 10:40

OleBerg, on May 22 2009, 01:35 AM, said:

JLOL, on May 22 2009, 02:30 AM, said:

655321, on May 21 2009, 06:01 PM, said:

Hmm, my interpretation of the LOL is that "Partner certainly is a lot closer to acting than we were." is not a strong enough statement in favor of bidding.

i.e.  North's double in fact is clearcut, but jdonn's statement could be read as saying that, while North is closer (than South) to having a bid, he still has a pass.

(LOL at us analyzing a LOL :()

Yeah seriously north had the most obvious bid ever, and south had a pass.

Sorry for lack of LOL clarity.

If I was qualified to LOL, I would never explain my LOL's.

So an unqulified LOL at explaining your LOL.

LOL at having to be qualified to LOL someone
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#46 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2009-May-22, 14:59

South pass is clear cut. North should act like hes in the balancing seat.

Surely if it goes

(3S)----P-------(4S)------P
(P)------???

and you have a 0544 and some values, passing W/W would not cross your mind right ? So its the same thing for me.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#47 User is offline   qwery_hi 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 493
  • Joined: 2008-July-10
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA, USA

Posted 2009-May-22, 19:05

mtvesuvius, on May 22 2009, 08:40 AM, said:

OleBerg, on May 22 2009, 01:35 AM, said:

JLOL, on May 22 2009, 02:30 AM, said:

655321, on May 21 2009, 06:01 PM, said:

Hmm, my interpretation of the LOL is that "Partner certainly is a lot closer to acting than we were." is not a strong enough statement in favor of bidding.

i.e.  North's double in fact is clearcut, but jdonn's statement could be read as saying that, while North is closer (than South) to having a bid, he still has a pass.

(LOL at us analyzing a LOL :))

Yeah seriously north had the most obvious bid ever, and south had a pass.

Sorry for lack of LOL clarity.

If I was qualified to LOL, I would never explain my LOL's.

So an unqulified LOL at explaining your LOL.

LOL at having to be qualified to LOL someone

Seconded. LOL
Alle Menschen werden bruder.

Where were you while we were getting high?
0

#48 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2009-May-23, 00:01

qwery_hi, on May 23 2009, 03:05 AM, said:

mtvesuvius, on May 22 2009, 08:40 AM, said:

OleBerg, on May 22 2009, 01:35 AM, said:

JLOL, on May 22 2009, 02:30 AM, said:

655321, on May 21 2009, 06:01 PM, said:

Hmm, my interpretation of the LOL is that "Partner certainly is a lot closer to acting than we were." is not a strong enough statement in favor of bidding.

i.e.  North's double in fact is clearcut, but jdonn's statement could be read as saying that, while North is closer (than South) to having a bid, he still has a pass.

(LOL at us analyzing a LOL :P)

Yeah seriously north had the most obvious bid ever, and south had a pass.

Sorry for lack of LOL clarity.

If I was qualified to LOL, I would never explain my LOL's.

So an unqulified LOL at explaining your LOL.

LOL at having to be qualified to LOL someone

Seconded. LOL

I do not consider you two to be qualified to LOL.

So I can only LOL at your LOL'ing me for thinking you have to be LOL.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.

Gnasher
0

#49 User is offline   qwery_hi 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 493
  • Joined: 2008-July-10
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA, USA

Posted 2009-May-23, 10:39

OleBerg, on May 22 2009, 10:01 PM, said:

qwery_hi, on May 23 2009, 03:05 AM, said:

mtvesuvius, on May 22 2009, 08:40 AM, said:

OleBerg, on May 22 2009, 01:35 AM, said:

JLOL, on May 22 2009, 02:30 AM, said:

655321, on May 21 2009, 06:01 PM, said:

Hmm, my interpretation of the LOL is that "Partner certainly is a lot closer to acting than we were." is not a strong enough statement in favor of bidding.

i.e.  North's double in fact is clearcut, but jdonn's statement could be read as saying that, while North is closer (than South) to having a bid, he still has a pass.

(LOL at us analyzing a LOL :P)

Yeah seriously north had the most obvious bid ever, and south had a pass.

Sorry for lack of LOL clarity.

If I was qualified to LOL, I would never explain my LOL's.

So an unqulified LOL at explaining your LOL.

LOL at having to be qualified to LOL someone

Seconded. LOL

I do not consider you two to be qualified to LOL.

So I can only LOL at your LOL'ing me for thinking you have to be LOL.

Stop LOL'ing out of your ass
Alle Menschen werden bruder.

Where were you while we were getting high?
0
  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users