♠K6
♥AKQ1063
♦AK652
white/red, 4th seat
Bidding goes:
pass-pass-2C*-X (you)
3C - pass - 4C - 4NT (showing 2 suits)
pass - 5D- pass - ?
How would you bid this?
* 2C shows 5+ clubs 10-15
3C is non constructive
Page 1 of 1
How to bid this hand?
#2
Posted 2010-May-08, 00:52
Agree with the bidding so far and would bid 5NT (choice of slams) now.
Slam is not certain but I cannot pass when 12 tricks are likely and I haven't shown the full strength of my hand so can't expect partner to bid more than 5♦ on most hands where slam is good. A grand slam try is too much - partner is quite unlikely to have the ♠A and he could well accept without it given that he has shown nothing.
Partner has better diamonds than hearts, so 5NT suggests five diamonds and a six card major, allowing us to play 6♥ opposite for example xxxxx xxx Qxx xx. 5♥ also suggests this hand type but slightly weaker and is a non-forcing slam try, maybe the same hand without the ♥Q would bid 5♥.
Slam is not certain but I cannot pass when 12 tricks are likely and I haven't shown the full strength of my hand so can't expect partner to bid more than 5♦ on most hands where slam is good. A grand slam try is too much - partner is quite unlikely to have the ♠A and he could well accept without it given that he has shown nothing.
Partner has better diamonds than hearts, so 5NT suggests five diamonds and a six card major, allowing us to play 6♥ opposite for example xxxxx xxx Qxx xx. 5♥ also suggests this hand type but slightly weaker and is a non-forcing slam try, maybe the same hand without the ♥Q would bid 5♥.
#3
Posted 2010-May-08, 05:20
Tough problem. I wonder what 5♣ by partner would be, maybe 4234 suggesting he prefers spades if I had spades and diamonds (assuming 3♣ over 2♣ shows both majors)? If that's the case then logically partner doesn't have spade length so maybe he's 3244 or 4144 or 2254? Think I'm just gonna bid 6♦.
- Andy -
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#4
Posted 2010-May-08, 05:50
I still dislike these offshape doubles, we will never come close to describing our hand.
4D if played as leaping michaels or
6H with no special agreements.
4D if played as leaping michaels or
6H with no special agreements.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#5
Posted 2010-May-08, 08:08
gwnn, on May 8 2010, 06:50 AM, said:
I still dislike these offshape doubles, we will never come close to describing our hand.
4D if played as leaping michaels or
6H with no special agreements.
4D if played as leaping michaels or
6H with no special agreements.
Double-jumping to 4D seems like an unnecessary waste of valuable space ( eventho it is much better than the X , then 4NT ).
Here is a simplified 2-suiter system I learned some years ago for a weak-2D open, but applying it to the special 2C! open (= to a real suit, opening values ) :
4C = both Majors
3H-jump = H/D
3S-jump = S/D
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
With the OP bidding, where partner shows a preference to Diam, I'd have to go with 6D ...... unfortunately leaving the ♠K x vulnerable to an opening lead assault .
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
#6
Posted 2010-May-08, 08:54
DAPO/Super MAF uses 2S as 2-suited not Spades, not clubs.
Then Q-bid shows slam try/force, even repeat Q-bid here.
Partner evaluates very well after that description.
Then Q-bid shows slam try/force, even repeat Q-bid here.
Partner evaluates very well after that description.
Page 1 of 1