bluejak, on 2010-November-04, 06:51, said:
So, because that is nonsense, you assume he meant something else. But the difference I assume he meant what everyone knows he meant, half the posts assume he meant something else. As for asking me how I know what he meant, be serious, please.
You justify your assumption, and deprecate others', by saying "everyone knows he meant" what you assume. But that isn't true. All I know is what he said, and he did not say "cash three rounds of clubs".
If I had been there, I would have asked him what he meant, and I would base my ruling on that. But I wasn't there. All I have to go on is what he said. So I'm basing my ruling on that. Paul was there, but apparently he didn't ask this question, he just made the same assumption you did. Somebody mentioned the "calibre" of the player. I don't know who he was, and even if I knew his name I'd probably have no idea of his "calibre". So if people are basing assumptions on knowing the player, they're acting on information not available to me. That's cheating.