BBO Discussion Forums: Rebid? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Rebid?

#1 User is offline   Mozza 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 2011-January-23

Posted 2011-January-23, 10:44

IMPS Favourable

You hold

♠A103
♥QJ9642
♦A
♣A63

1H: 1S

Playing ACOL (4 card majors and a 12-14 NT), what's your rebid?

Would your answer be different if
(i) playing 5 card majors; or

(ii) vulnerable at IMPs?
Thanks.
0

#2 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-January-23, 14:54

3♥, any other bid will mis-describe the hand more IMO... I could try a heavy 2♥, but I think this is a bit much.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#3 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-January-23, 15:24

2♣.

I miss JDonn posting...
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#4 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,167
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-24, 01:14

Hi,

playing Acol - 3H.

Playing 5 card major, and a more american style, I may just bid 2H,
vulnerability and format does not play a big role.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#5 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2011-January-24, 01:33

Playing Acol, 2H. The hearts are not good enough for 3H, and 2C is awful. 2S is a possibility.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#6 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2011-January-24, 02:05

3H.

I'll leave 2C to experts like Phil. I don't see any reason to underbid with 2H.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#7 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-January-24, 08:42

Well, 3♥ for me. Shape/strength before honor placement. ALWAYS.
0

#8 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,077
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2011-January-24, 10:32

2♣ is the sort of bid I've had a lot of success with in an acol context, but we almost never pass 2♣. The problem with 3♥ and to some extent 2♥ is that you'll play in ♥ when you should be in ♠ a lot. 1♥-1♠-2♣-2♥-2♠ showing 3 spades and extras is reasonably descriptive (OK, it's more likely to be 3514, but it's close) and stands a chance of getting you to the right place.
0

#9 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2011-January-24, 20:55

2♣ for me, opening 1 and jumping to 3 on the same suit is % 100 related with suit quality for me.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#10 User is offline   BobElliott 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: 2008-April-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-25, 07:44

If you play FLANNERY(I DO), this is a 3♠ rebid. Take away the ♥Q and you rebid 2♠. The upside of flannery is
not so much the 2♦ opening, but the ability to raise with only 3♠ knowing partner has 5+♠ or 4 good ones.
0

#11 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-January-25, 11:13

Playing a weak notrump means there's more case for 2♠, because partner will expect an unbalanced hand or a strong notrump, but I think this is too good

I'd bid 2♣. 3♥ is atypical in three ways: the hearts are weak, it's very suitable for playing in spades, and it's a bit light on values. I could live with two of those, but three is too many.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
2

#12 User is offline   Mozza 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 2011-January-23

Posted 2011-January-25, 12:33

Thanks for the replies. I rebid an admittedly conservative 2H. The hand is improved by the spade fit so I thought about 3H but I didn't like the stiff A and weak H suit.

Either the temporising 2C (I now better understand the merits of this bid. I did fleetingly consider it at the time but was concerned that it didn't get across either of the 2 main features of my hand - (i) the 6th heart; (ii) the 3 card spade holding) or 3H should get you to the cold game we (I) missed - partner held

♠KQxx
♥10xx
♦Kxxx
♣ xx.
0

#13 User is offline   BobElliott 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: 2008-April-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-25, 15:16

View PostMozza, on 2011-January-25, 12:33, said:

Thanks for the replies. I rebid an admittedly conservative 2H. The hand is improved by the spade fit so I thought about 3H but I didn't like the stiff A and weak H suit.

Either the temporising 2C (I now better understand the merits of this bid. I did fleetingly consider it at the time but was concerned that it didn't get across either of the 2 main features of my hand - (i) the 6th heart; (ii) the 3 card spade holding) or 3H should get you to the cold game we (I) missed - partner held

♠KQxx
♥10xx
♦Kxxx
♣ xx.

Why 1♠..you are only worth 1 bid..2♥seems clear.
0

#14 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-January-25, 15:47

agree with bob
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#15 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2011-January-25, 16:24

View PostBobElliott, on 2011-January-25, 15:16, said:

Why 1♠..you are only worth 1 bid..2♥seems clear.

not everyone allows 3-card raises in Acol
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#16 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-January-25, 16:28

I think 1♠ is the normal action playing 4-card majors. Both actions may lead to a 4-3 fit, but 2♥ risks losing a 4-4 fit when opener is in the 15-16 range.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users