How do folks play Rosenkranz? Without discussion, I made a Rosenkranz double with Axxxx support for partner's suit (a 5332 hand) because I thought a simple raise would deny a high honor. Partner described my double as probably Hx. He thinks I should have raised right away to block the opponents.
Does a raise necessarily deny a high honor?
Page 1 of 1
Rosenkranz doubles
#2
Posted 2011-January-30, 21:46
Whether a raise denies a spade A or K is immaterial on this hand. Rosenkranz are meant to help defend the hand, while you are pretty sure that you want to do whatever you can to declare. I think your partner is right to say you should make a blocking bid, which means that those bids do not necessarily deny the A or K.
Chris Gibson
#3
Posted 2011-January-30, 22:18
Would you then only use a Rosenkranz double with Hx?
This link suggests that the raise denies an honor and I didn't want partner to be afraid of leading our suit.
http://www.ask.com/w...senkranz_double
This link suggests that the raise denies an honor and I didn't want partner to be afraid of leading our suit.
http://www.ask.com/w...senkranz_double
#4
Posted 2011-January-31, 01:59
IMO, consuming bidding space takes precedence over Rosenkranz and it makes sense to play the X only with Hx (maybe Axx if you want to stretch it).
Partner won't be afraid to lead the overcalled suit after a raise if that looks like the right opening lead...
Partner won't be afraid to lead the overcalled suit after a raise if that looks like the right opening lead...
foobar on BBO
#5
Posted 2011-January-31, 02:11
Hi,
if you make a preemeptive raise, p knowes, our side has 9 cards
in the suit, so the risk, that a lead in this suit blowes a trick
is reduced, ..., the only holding is now bascially Qx vs. Ax.
So the only question is, if a single raise denies a top honor or
not.
With kind regards
Marlowe
if you make a preemeptive raise, p knowes, our side has 9 cards
in the suit, so the risk, that a lead in this suit blowes a trick
is reduced, ..., the only holding is now bascially Qx vs. Ax.
So the only question is, if a single raise denies a top honor or
not.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2011-January-31, 02:20
straube, on 2011-January-30, 22:18, said:
Would you then only use a Rosenkranz double with Hx?
This link suggests that the raise denies an honor and I didn't want partner to be afraid of leading our suit.
http://www.ask.com/w...senkranz_double
This link suggests that the raise denies an honor and I didn't want partner to be afraid of leading our suit.
http://www.ask.com/w...senkranz_double
The link you mention reads "if, instead, the advancer makes a raise to the two-level in overcaller's suit, he denies possession of a top honor in that suit" (my italics). With Axxxx you wouldn't be raising only to the two-level anyway.
I play Rosencranz redoubles, but when I have a raise I raise. Hence the redouble shows Hx or possibly a singleton honour.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
Page 1 of 1