barmar, on 2013-August-21, 13:09, said:
Trinidad, on 2013-August-21, 01:14, said:
I don't really regard the CIA as an authority on English spelling.
They said this comes from a number of sources, then listed three of them by name, the CIA World Factbook being just one of them.
That is true, but the other two that were mentioned were not really great linguistic works or institutions either, were they?
I would like someone with a good knowledge of the
English language (and not geography) explain to me how you can refer to a
specific set of something without a definite article.
When I am building something and I ask one of my kids to hand me "the screws", he will know that I specifically mean those 1/8"x1.5" screws that are right next to him and that we bought together for this project. He will not go to my garage and get me some random screws. And when I ask him to get "screws", he will go to the garage and come back with a few small, medium and large screws. (He might even ask, while pointing at the 1/8"x1.5" screws: "Why are these not ok, dad?".)
We are not dealing with nether lands in general or some random nether lands (e.g. those in Louisiana or Bangladesh). We are specifically dealing with The Netherlands ("Aha! Those by the North Sea!"). If I am in Australia and say that I live in "Netherlands", that should provoke the reply "Ooooh, that sounds like a flood risk, mate. In which nether lands do you live? I hope it is those by the North Sea. They at least have dikes around them.". While if I say that I live in "The Netherlands" that should provoke a discussion about windmills and tulips and not about the dangers of living low or alligators.
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg