affe82, on 2012-May-04, 03:50, said:
if you open good 10s and can have an excellent 15 it makes all the sense to split the range for the version of gazilli I play in precision.
we don't play forcing nt either so the comment about 5-3 M+clubs is semi void.
I find gazilli a great tool for judging when to invite/bid thin games.
admittedly we play inv+ trf follow ups on 2/1 so a lot of the good hands in 1n are gone and responders 1n is most likely a very descriptive bid. Finding the right partscore when opener is balanced is a lot easier when ranges are split and most likely the hand with suitlenghts interested in not playing 1n.
where i play a version of gazilli to precision systems is standard. greater minds then my i trust. there are few problem hands in the version suggested.
we don't play forcing nt either so the comment about 5-3 M+clubs is semi void.
I find gazilli a great tool for judging when to invite/bid thin games.
admittedly we play inv+ trf follow ups on 2/1 so a lot of the good hands in 1n are gone and responders 1n is most likely a very descriptive bid. Finding the right partscore when opener is balanced is a lot easier when ranges are split and most likely the hand with suitlenghts interested in not playing 1n.
where i play a version of gazilli to precision systems is standard. greater minds then my i trust. there are few problem hands in the version suggested.
I haven't played Gazilli in a precision context, but if you like to open 1M light (which generally seems to be a win if you can handle the followups), i think it would make sense to separate hands within a 8(9)-15 range.