BBO Discussion Forums: 应叫人1M-3D在xyz(NT)与walsh的冲突 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

应叫人1M-3D在xyz(NT)与walsh的冲突 理论

#1 User is offline   yin970902 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 303
  • Joined: 2012-May-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chengdu

Posted 2012-June-11, 19:44

请看进程:
W--N--E--S--
---1(P)1
(P)1(P)3

在xyz(NT)或称mtws的进程下的牌是好套,满贯兴趣。如:
K5 AQJ83 KQJ74 5
而在Walsh的进程下是底限6-4牌型。如:
62 Q974 KJT862 5

类似的进程还有
1 1/
1nt 3

1 1
1nt 3

而应叫人的再跳叫3C进程则是统一的;均表示邀叫、C套6张+。
上善若水,厚德载物
Believe, insist on, Thanksgiving
0

#2 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2012-June-11, 22:05

View Postyin970902, on 2012-June-11, 19:44, said:

请看进程:
W--N--E--S--
---1(P)1
(P)1(P)3

在xyz(NT)或称mtws的进程下的牌是好套,满贯兴趣。如:
K5 AQJ83 KQJ74 5
而在Walsh的进程下是底限6-4牌型。如:
62 Q974 KJT862 5

类似的进程还有
1 1/
1nt 3

1 1
1nt 3

而应叫人的再跳叫3C进程则是统一的;均表示邀叫、C套6张+。


My God!敬爱的楼主啊,有没有搞错呀,第一个牌例当然再叫3D;
而第二个牌例是再叫2C,逼迫开叫人2D接力,然后Pass。这是两个不同序列的叫牌进程哦。
哈....Do you know what I said? And you are welcome anytime :D
0

#3 User is offline   yin970902 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 303
  • Joined: 2012-May-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chengdu

Posted 2012-June-11, 22:49

walsh的理念是非常好的,先高后低5+~9-;9+~12-;12+~及以上就先1再高花(逆叫)。
就1M-3D来讲,pd之间要商定;
甚至可以说用xyz(NT)就够了。
上善若水,厚德载物
Believe, insist on, Thanksgiving
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users