I was called to a table yesterday where I saw the following bidding cards on the table:
...South.....West......North
.....1♠.....stop card....1NT
I think it's clear that North thought West had passed. I asked if anyone had done anything else, whether West or East had actually bid. I was told that West had started to bid, and had removed bidding cards from the box, but that no one had seen what the bid was. I established to all players' agreement that this had happened before North bid 1NT. (West subsequently returned the cards to the box to await the TD's ruling.)
Do you rule that this is a call out of rotation, or an insufficient bid?
Page 1 of 1
Insufficient or out of turn? (EBU)
#2
Posted 2012-November-12, 07:56
VixTD, on 2012-November-12, 07:53, said:
I was called to a table yesterday where I saw the following bidding cards on the table:
...South.....West......North
.....1♠.....stop card....1NT
I think it's clear that North thought West had passed. I asked if anyone had done anything else, whether West or East had actually bid. I was told that West had started to bid, and had removed bidding cards from the box, but that no one had seen what the bid was. I established to all players' agreement that this had happened before North bid 1NT. (West subsequently returned the cards to the box to await the TD's ruling.)
Do you rule that this is a call out of rotation, or an insufficient bid?
...South.....West......North
.....1♠.....stop card....1NT
I think it's clear that North thought West had passed. I asked if anyone had done anything else, whether West or East had actually bid. I was told that West had started to bid, and had removed bidding cards from the box, but that no one had seen what the bid was. I established to all players' agreement that this had happened before North bid 1NT. (West subsequently returned the cards to the box to await the TD's ruling.)
Do you rule that this is a call out of rotation, or an insufficient bid?
The regulations say that a call is made when the bidding cards have been taken out of the box with intent. From your description that had happened before the 1NT bid was made.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
London UK
#3
Posted 2012-November-12, 09:37
ie 1NT was insufficient.
David Stevenson
Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
#4
Posted 2012-November-12, 10:31
VixTD, on 2012-November-12, 07:53, said:
I was called to a table yesterday where I saw the following bidding cards on the table:
...South.....West......North
.....1♠.....stop card....1NT
I think it's clear that North thought West had passed. I asked if anyone had done anything else, whether West or East had actually bid. I was told that West had started to bid, and had removed bidding cards from the box, but that no one had seen what the bid was. I established to all players' agreement that this had happened before North bid 1NT. (West subsequently returned the cards to the box to await the TD's ruling.)
Do you rule that this is a call out of rotation, or an insufficient bid?
...South.....West......North
.....1♠.....stop card....1NT
I think it's clear that North thought West had passed. I asked if anyone had done anything else, whether West or East had actually bid. I was told that West had started to bid, and had removed bidding cards from the box, but that no one had seen what the bid was. I established to all players' agreement that this had happened before North bid 1NT. (West subsequently returned the cards to the box to await the TD's ruling.)
Do you rule that this is a call out of rotation, or an insufficient bid?
Mistaking STOP for a PASS?
#5
Posted 2012-November-12, 10:46
pran, on 2012-November-12, 10:31, said:
Mistaking STOP for a PASS?
If N is being a bit careless (or maybe he's red-green colourblind?), he will no doubt spot that West pulled out something from the lower half of the bidding box, perhaps saw it incorrectly, and therefore concluded West had passed. Not implausible at all - just careless.
ahydra
#6
Posted 2012-November-12, 11:14
It seems more likely that North thought West had doubled. Either way, West has bid and depending on what that bid is either it or 1NT is insufficient.
#7
Posted 2012-November-12, 11:56
Agree with Fair Witness Campboy.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#8
Posted 2012-November-13, 07:30
I ruled it an insufficient bid, for the reason Gordon gives.
I think this shows the benefit of asking whether what you can see is really all that has happened. I got into the habit of doing this because I frequently found that a player would call over an insufficient bid, or play to a lead out of turn, and put the cards back before the director got there. In this case I found out that West had actually bid, when the players thought she had not.
I think this shows the benefit of asking whether what you can see is really all that has happened. I got into the habit of doing this because I frequently found that a player would call over an insufficient bid, or play to a lead out of turn, and put the cards back before the director got there. In this case I found out that West had actually bid, when the players thought she had not.
Page 1 of 1