Vul vs NV, imps. 1♦ shows 4+ (4-card majors, weak NT). What's your call? Is it close?
Least bad bid no ideal choice?
#1
Posted 2014-April-07, 04:04
Vul vs NV, imps. 1♦ shows 4+ (4-card majors, weak NT). What's your call? Is it close?
#2
Posted 2014-April-07, 04:09
#3
Posted 2014-April-07, 04:13
#4
Posted 2014-April-07, 04:48
It may go 1♠ on your left - p - 1nt back to you. Would you double now? I wouldn't (pard is an aggressive balancer) but if you do at least it approaches what you have.
What is baby oil made of?
#5
Posted 2014-April-07, 04:52
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#6
Posted 2014-April-07, 04:52
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#7
Posted 2014-April-07, 10:02
The side that opens the bidding plays most of the hands for a reason. It is just
plain not as safe to stick in a bid here when lho is unlimited they know their p has
opened the bidding and we do not really have tricks for offense if the opps decide
to x us at unfavorable.
There really does not seem to be any big hurry to bid anyway. If lho shows weakness
and the opps are letting the hand die at 1n (after lho bids 1s) or 2d it is not too late
to come in with a tox. Most other circumstances pass and hope declarer refuses to play
you for 15 count and silence during the bidding and you get a good result because of it.
#8
Posted 2014-April-07, 11:26
#9
Posted 2014-April-07, 12:39
xxx in a suit bid on your right is a death holding, and the heart suit is nowhere near robust enough to want to make us bid it, even at the one-level.
1N without a stopper is fashionable in some parts, but is generally only used over a minor opening that could be short....once opener promises 4+, it makes little sense. In addition, I think one needs at least a decent average hand for such an action, and this is a bad 15.
#10
Posted 2014-April-07, 14:48
ggwhiz, on 2014-April-07, 04:48, said:
Yes.
#11
Posted 2014-April-07, 15:28
gnasher, on 2014-April-07, 14:48, said:
As would I. This thread belongs in the beginner's forum, as does the one person who voted for double (and I have not checked who that was, so if it is a very strong player, I might have to eat my words).
I see it does not appear to be a public poll...
This post has been edited by lamford: 2014-April-07, 15:29
#12
Posted 2014-April-07, 15:34
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
#13
Posted 2014-April-07, 16:10
kuhchung, on 2014-April-07, 15:34, said:
I think it is takeout of spades, and includes a willingness to play diamonds (altho it certainly doesn't promise primary diamonds).
A prototypical holding would be 1=4=4=4 with opening values. Partner is supposed to bid a black suit if possible, but can definitely bid diamonds 'to play'. He can also pass, of course, with suitable defence.
This is a far more likely scenario than a hand that wants not only to defend 1N (with an unlimited LHO), and can penalize diamonds, and note that this is a hand that is on opening lead against 1N, so doesn't need to make a lead-directing double.
Besides, with the sort of hand that can defeat diamonds all by itself, it can choose to bid 2♦, since is seems very unlikely that 1N is going down, based on diamonds, AND that LHO has nowhere to go.
#14
Posted 2014-April-07, 16:29
1NT x
2♦ x
p x
2♦ x
#15
Posted 2014-April-08, 02:35
lamford, on 2014-April-07, 15:28, said:
Fair comment, perhaps - as someone said to me, pass is the bid you would make in a bidding quiz. In practice, though, both 1♥ and double were chosen in a recent county A team match, so perhaps some people find it more difficult to pass in practice than they do in theory?
#16
Posted 2014-April-08, 14:34
#17
Posted 2014-April-08, 15:10
#19
Posted 2014-April-08, 16:52
mikeh, on 2014-April-07, 12:39, said:
xxx in a suit bid on your right is a death holding, and the heart suit is nowhere near robust enough to want to make us bid it, even at the one-level.
1N without a stopper is fashionable in some parts, but is generally only used over a minor opening that could be short....once opener promises 4+, it makes little sense. In addition, I think one needs at least a decent average hand for such an action, and this is a bad 15.
we are all reading your posts and learning keep up the good work:))))))))))))))))))))
#20
Posted 2014-April-08, 18:22
Am I doubling in this auction? Of course I am. But nobody but me plays 4-card majors, weak NT over here :-)