IMPS.
♠ ---
♥ AQJ65
♦ AKT6
♣ AKQ8
1♥ or 2♣?
Also, any plans if it goes
1♥ 1♠
??
Page 1 of 1
ye olde "1x or 2C" dilemma
#2
Posted 2014-December-20, 15:15
I can't stand opening 2C on 2-suiters, never mind 3-suiters, but I don't see how you can do anything else on this hand.
None whatsoever.
Quote
Also, any plans if it goes
1♥ 1♠
1♥ 1♠
None whatsoever.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#3
Posted 2014-December-20, 17:12
With 5 hearts you don't waste nearly as much space opening 2♣ as you do with other hand types (unless you play some stupid system like 2♦ response shows 0-1 controls or whatever), so yeah, 2♣ opener here. I'll have a similar rebid problem after 2♣-2♦; 2♥-2♠, but I'll have shown my strength.
I'm thinking my rebid might actually be 3♦, then I can bid 4♣ over 3NT more economically.
I'm thinking my rebid might actually be 3♦, then I can bid 4♣ over 3NT more economically.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#4
Posted 2014-December-20, 17:43
My main worry with a 2♣ opener is a 2♠ response.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#5
Posted 2014-December-20, 20:13
A two loser hand with 8 controls cannot be a 1♥ opening. If even I open 2♣ then this must be a wtp question
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#6
Posted 2014-December-21, 04:04
mgoetze, on 2014-December-20, 17:12, said:
With 5 hearts you don't waste nearly as much space opening 2♣ as you do with other hand types (unless you play some stupid system like 2♦ response shows 0-1 controls or whatever), so yeah, 2♣ opener here. I'll have a similar rebid problem after 2♣-2♦; 2♥-2♠, but I'll have shown my strength.
I'm thinking my rebid might actually be 3♦, then I can bid 4♣ over 3NT more economically.
I'm thinking my rebid might actually be 3♦, then I can bid 4♣ over 3NT more economically.
If you play the 2C-2 D-2H is a relay thing you are pretty well positioned after 2C-2D-2H-2S-3C no?
#7
Posted 2014-December-21, 05:03
I would open 2♣, and then bid 2♥ natural. We play that 2♣-2M/3m is weak and to play vs a 20-21 NT. If partner bids 2♠, I will bid 2NT, which is forcing. If partner rebids 3♠ I will bid 3NT, if partner bids another suit I will raise and if partner bids 3NT/4♠ I'll pass.
If I opened 1♥ and partner responds 1♠ I'll bid 2♣ as Gazzilli, and if that is not available I'll bid 3♣.
If I opened 1♥ and partner responds 1♠ I'll bid 2♣ as Gazzilli, and if that is not available I'll bid 3♣.
#8
Posted 2014-December-21, 05:12
Added a poll. Actually, I had one in 1st post, but forum software is deceiving in making polls. yuck
#9
Posted 2014-December-21, 07:30
Where's the 'I play strong 1♥, ha!' option?
Good for Fantunes and Groovers.
Good for Fantunes and Groovers.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
Page 1 of 1