Fresh off the press
#21
Posted 2015-January-04, 03:24
#22
Posted 2015-January-04, 03:47
#23
Posted 2015-January-04, 10:21
Oops.
More later, teams today.
#24
Posted 2015-January-04, 10:51
#25
Posted 2015-January-04, 11:20
-- Bertrand Russell
#26
Posted 2015-January-04, 11:30
TylerE, on 2015-January-03, 16:51, said:
It depends.
After 1♠ - 1N - 2♦ - 2♥ - 3♦ is just looking for a better place to land, however, expect partner to make the wrong decision with 2-2 in the pointed suits.
But if the auction starts:1♠ - 1N - 2♦ - 2♠, 3♦ is definitely extras.
Either way, even if you land on your feet, you'll have a hard time convincing anyone you are showing longer diamonds.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#27
Posted 2015-January-04, 22:07
mgoetze, on 2015-January-04, 11:20, said:
No, after calming down when he thought I was showing a "huge hand" he said he should bid diamonds.
#28
Posted 2015-January-04, 22:10
#29
Posted 2015-January-04, 22:22
#30
Posted 2015-January-04, 22:28
nige1, on 2015-January-04, 22:22, said:
- Over 2N, South: 3♦ = 10, 3♠ = 7
- Over 3♠, North: 4♣ = 10, 3N = 9, 5♦ = 8, 6♦ = 7.
Nige, your rating system is starting to annoy me, it would be much more useful to hear the reason WHY you rated the bids that way.
#31
Posted 2015-January-04, 22:55
jillybean, on 2015-January-04, 22:28, said:
- Over partner's 2N, a 3♦ rebid is non-forcing and limits your hand. As Mr Ace and Phil point out, opponents have a heart fit and if they bid 3♥, you might elect to bid 3♠, which should show 56 shape, without promising a mountain.
- Most partnerships treat an immediate 3♠ as a reverse, showing a better hand than you hold but you bravely chose that bid, at the table. Over that, partner might try for a slam with a 4♣ cue-bid. He might worry that a 4♣ cue-bid sets ♠ as trumps, so he might settle for game in 3N or 5♦. With a maximum pass, 4 card ♦ support, and a couple of aces, he might hazard 6♦ (expecting you to have more for your 3♠ bid).
#32
Posted 2015-January-04, 23:10
#33
Posted 2015-January-05, 00:50
the hog, on 2015-January-04, 03:47, said:
Why not? If I can buy the contract in 1nt all white when it seems very likely that the opponents have 8 or 9 tricks in a ♥ contract (they have at least a 9 card fit), that seems like a great thing. I expect we have 19-22 hcp and no guarantee of a fit. I think it reasonably likely that I can setup and enjoy the diamonds, and think I'll make 1nt decently often, with overtricks some of the time, and rarely be down many tricks. It is true I might miss a 5-3 spade fit or a 6-3 diamond fit, but I don't think the other auctions are likely to be that great for me once it has gone 1♦-1nt. I much prefer when it goes the reasonably likely 1♦-1♥-1♠ or the less likely 1♦-1♠ or opponents bidding, but I tried my best by opening 1♦ and now I take my medicine (of missed possible spade fit) on this auction.
Oops.
More later, teams today.