BBO Discussion Forums: Quiz: How could this happen? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Quiz: How could this happen?

#1 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-December-22, 11:53

Robot Rebat, 5 boards in. My score sheet says:

Quote

Score: 50%
Rank: 1
Clock: 21


(I do have a screenshot, but sorry, too lazy to upload it somewhere given that images are disabled on BBF.)
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#2 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2015-December-22, 12:21

How about no scores compared, everyone thus tied for first, and you are the first alphabetically?

Of course, I don't know. But there is a tie for first on summary with ACBLscore, when no scores have been posted from remote yet...might be similar thing on BBO.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#3 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2015-December-22, 12:26

View Postcherdano, on 2015-December-22, 11:53, said:

Robot Rebat, 5 boards in. My score sheet says:



(I do have a screenshot, but sorry, too lazy to upload it somewhere given that images are disabled on BBF.)

Are you Flight A? Isn't this score tiered?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#4 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2015-December-22, 12:37

A lot of adjusted scores to average minus for both sides?
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#5 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-December-22, 13:09

View Postgwnn, on 2015-December-22, 12:26, said:

Are you Flight A? Isn't this score tiered?


I don't know whether this one is tiered, but if so I am Flight A.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#6 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2015-December-22, 14:39

a rare combination of 5 straight pushes but you played them the fastest and time is a tie breaker?????
0

#7 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-December-22, 14:50

View Postgszes, on 2015-December-22, 14:39, said:

a rare combination of 5 straight pushes but you played them the fastest and time is a tie breaker?????

If there is a tie, it says so, e.g. "Rank: 1-5"
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#8 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2015-December-22, 20:45

How about if someone was ahead of you but withdrew, and you're the top player left?
0

#9 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2015-December-22, 20:49

View Postcherdano, on 2015-December-22, 13:09, said:

View Postgwnn, on 2015-December-22, 12:26, said:

Are you Flight A? Isn't this score tiered?


I don't know whether this one is tiered, but if so I am Flight A.

No, you're not.

http://webutil.bridg...5221&u=cherdano
0

#10 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2015-December-22, 22:01

Look, just because Arend's not a LIFE MASTER doesn't mean he's not Flight A.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#11 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2015-December-22, 23:23

It's my understanding (hopefully Barry will correct me if I'm wrong) that strata are determined individually for each tournament, based on enrollment, with the top third of MP holders being A, the middle third being B and the bottom third being C. So, it's entirely possible for a player to sometimes fall in any of the three divisions. In the tournament results page I've linked, Cherdano qualified for B; in the tournaments immediately before and after that one he was C and A. I'm guessing it was the small high-powered tournament where he was C that he got that funny standings report. There have been several posts suggesting that in-tournament results get reported overall rather than stratified, but BBO seems not to think that's a good idea.
0

#12 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2015-December-23, 06:21

View PostBbradley62, on 2015-December-22, 23:23, said:

It's my understanding (hopefully Barry will correct me if I'm wrong) that strata are determined individually for each tournament, based on enrollment, with the top third of MP holders being A, the middle third being B and the bottom third being C. So, it's entirely possible for a player to sometimes fall in any of the three divisions. In the tournament results page I've linked, Cherdano qualified for B; in the tournaments immediately before and after that one he was C and A. I'm guessing it was the small high-powered tournament where he was C that he got that funny standings report. There have been several posts suggesting that in-tournament results get reported overall rather than stratified, but BBO seems not to think that's a good idea.

Yes I'm usually Flight C and occasionally Flight B.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#13 User is offline   beowulf 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 2005-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Bridge, music, railroads, beer

Posted 2015-December-23, 22:15

Could it be that there are multiple sections (your posted score during the tournament is your section score, I believe) yet the match pointing is done across the field. Then if it turns out that the other people in your section have score less than 50%, you will appear to ranked #1.
0

#14 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2015-December-24, 03:59

Oh, is that why the rank is always wrong, because it's only comparing me to the other flight C players? Well, whatever, I only care about getting 55% anyway.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#15 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-December-24, 06:52

View PostBbradley62, on 2015-December-22, 23:23, said:

It's my understanding (hopefully Barry will correct me if I'm wrong) that strata are determined individually for each tournament, based on enrollment, with the top third of MP holders being A, the middle third being B and the bottom third being C. So, it's entirely possible for a player to sometimes fall in any of the three divisions. In the tournament results page I've linked, Cherdano qualified for B; in the tournaments immediately before and after that one he was C and A. I'm guessing it was the small high-powered tournament where he was C that he got that funny standings report. There have been several posts suggesting that in-tournament results get reported overall rather than stratified, but BBO seems not to think that's a good idea.


I see. I indeed was the only Flight C player in the tournament where this happened. Never realized that the rank displays the flighted rank, seems pretty strange and unexpected.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#16 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2015-December-25, 17:20

View Postcherdano, on 2015-December-24, 06:52, said:

I see. I indeed was the only Flight C player in the tournament where this happened. Never realized that the rank displays the flighted rank, seems pretty strange and unexpected.

You were the only one who finished the tournament. Six players started, with two assigned to each stratum.
0

#17 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-December-26, 03:34

View PostBbradley62, on 2015-December-25, 17:20, said:

You were the only one who finished the tournament. Six players started, with two assigned to each stratum.

Wait! How do you know in which tournament I had noticed this?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

6 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users