BBO Discussion Forums: What does this bid mean? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What does this bid mean?

#1 User is offline   zenbiddist 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 2013-May-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2020-May-03, 18:05

Playing a style of 2/1 where Opener's 2NT Rebid is 12-14 bal or 18-19 bal, obviously the bigger hand bids again.
With a doubleton in Responder's suit, it makes sense for Opener to rebid 4NT quant.

My question is, would 4, 4 and 4 over 3NT in this sequence show three card support for Responder's minor and a slammish 18-19 bal hand?


It seems logical to me playing this 2NT rebid style, but I've never read/talked about it, and I usually play a different structure.

Thanks
0

#2 User is offline   DavidKok 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Joined: 2020-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2020-May-04, 03:23

I'd argue that opposite 18-19 bal with 5332 shape and no major fit the most likely slam is 6NT even if you have a 5-3 fit in a minor, so I'd probably interpret this as a general cue bid, neither promising nor denying diamond support. Also I think this two-way 2NT is a bit shifty - the bidding is already GF, and now opener needs to introduce artificial bids at the 4-level to show his strength. Normally 2/1 avoids this, bidding slowly with strong hands.
0

#3 User is offline   nofr 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 2011-May-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:France

Posted 2020-May-09, 02:01

View Postzenbiddist, on 2020-May-03, 18:05, said:

Playing a style of 2/1 where Opener's 2NT Rebid is 12-14 bal or 18-19 bal, obviously the bigger hand bids again.
With a doubleton in Responder's suit, it makes sense for Opener to rebid 4NT quant.

My question is, would 4, 4 and 4 over 3NT in this sequence show three card support for Responder's minor and a slammish 18-19 bal hand?


It seems logical to me playing this 2NT rebid style, but I've never read/talked about it, and I usually play a different structure.

Thanks


1 [hearts 2[dia
3NT : 18-19 with 2cards

1[hearts] 2
2NT. 3Nt
4NT : 18-19 with 3cards
4 : 18-19 with 4cards
0

#4 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,875
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2020-May-10, 14:12

View PostDavidKok, on 2020-May-04, 03:23, said:

I'd argue that opposite 18-19 bal with 5332 shape and no major fit the most likely slam is 6NT even if you have a 5-3 fit in a minor, so I'd probably interpret this as a general cue bid, neither promising nor denying diamond support. Also I think this two-way 2NT is a bit shifty - the bidding is already GF, and now opener needs to introduce artificial bids at the 4-level to show his strength. Normally 2/1 avoids this, bidding slowly with strong hands.


I was taught to respond 2NT as 12-14 and 3NT as 18-19 (17+ over 1M).
Not sure what disadvantages this has compared to a two-way scheme, the advantage of clarity is obvious.
0

#5 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,018
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2020-May-10, 14:41

View Postpescetom, on 2020-May-10, 14:12, said:

I was taught to respond 2NT as 12-14 and 3NT as 18-19 (17+ over 1M).
Not sure what disadvantages this has compared to a two-way scheme, the advantage of clarity is obvious.

I would have said the advantages of going slow were fairly obvious also - eg what if responder has heart support and was planning to make a delayed raise of 3 then start a cuebidding sequence? If the right spot is no-trumps, you can always show your strength later; if not, you get the extra room to find it.

A poll was done on the 3NT bid at BW a couple of years ago - far and away the most popular option (45%) was a 15-17 that wasn't suitable for 1N, with 28% voting for 18-19 options, 12% saying never bid it, and 8% some form of minimum. Many of the voters / commenters who voted for it showing 18-19 said they'd still go the 2NT - 4NT route for suitable 18-19 hands.
0

#6 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2020-May-10, 15:43

View Postzenbiddist, on 2020-May-03, 18:05, said:

Playing a style of 2/1 where Opener's 2NT Rebid is 12-14 bal or 18-19 bal, obviously the bigger hand bids again.
With a doubleton in Responder's suit, it makes sense for Opener to rebid 4NT quant.

My question is, would 4, 4 and 4 over 3NT in this sequence show three card support for Responder's minor and a slammish 18-19 bal hand?


My preference that these show shape in a (semi)balanced hands. E.g. if you are 2524, you get a much more defined auction if you first bid 2N and then follow-up with 4C. If you start with 3C, and partner bids 3 (which he often has to do on a doubleton), then what next?
4D would show 3-card support.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
1

#7 User is offline   zenbiddist 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 2013-May-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2020-May-17, 19:48

View Postnofr, on 2020-May-09, 02:01, said:

1 2
3NT : 18-19 with 2cards

1 2
2NT. 3Nt
4NT : 18-19 with 3cards
4 : 18-19 with 4cards


That looks playable!
The players who use the structure used Opener's Jump-3NT rebid for something else, but this makes a lot of sense.
0

#8 User is offline   danailov 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 2020-May-18

Posted 2020-May-18, 11:20

My preference is:
1-2:
3NT = 15-17 and Splinter
4 = 18+ Splinter

1 - 2
2NT - 3NT:
4 = 3 + cue bid
4 = 2542 18+
4 = 3, Solid , no cue
4 = 3, no cue bid, no solid
0

#9 User is offline   msjennifer 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,366
  • Joined: 2013-August-03
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Variable private
  • Interests:Cricket,Photography,Paediatrics and Community Medicine.

Posted 2020-May-19, 01:19

Sir ,to me it sounds a club cue with an honour to three D support and of course 18-19 HCP as per the bidding understandings mentioned.
0

#10 User is offline   iandayre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Joined: 2013-December-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2020-May-22, 10:24

Seems to me it would show the higher range, with concentration in C with relatively weak S.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users