https://tinyurl.com/y27helwj
Kinda hated to need to bash on this one, especially with the King of Clubs marked, but transport rates to be a problem and I don't see any good way to place Jacks
Page 1 of 1
Probably the best hand that I ever got dealt and I had to table it as dummy
#2
Posted 2020-August-17, 11:11
I forget the exact hand, but partner held a 27 or 28 count with ♦AKQJxx and heard me open a weak 2♦ (4+♦, 0-10) so had to put down one of the better dummys I've seen. 6♦= missed at the other table, the key was that the auction started 2♦-2N-3♣(minimum, nat 4+ cards) so he knew I had at most 5 major suit cards and could count the covers.
#3
Posted 2020-August-17, 13:23
South had a gun to his head and was told he would be killed if he passed, or is this a modern style of must open on any absolute garbage third seat non-vulnerable?
#4
Posted 2020-August-17, 15:44
AL78, on 2020-August-17, 13:23, said:
South had a gun to his head and was told he would be killed if he passed, or is this a modern style of must open on any absolute garbage third seat non-vulnerable?
Have to be a silver bullet given the competitor's name
Easy to miss 7♠ here, even assuming the ♣ finesse is working, but with my luck I would be in 7♠ as East after South's 3♣ pre-empt and have ♣J10x myself and see the first round ruffed by North when South holds a 7 card ♣ suit
And it just proves how difficult it is to bid big, big hands (especially balanced) opposite a near Yarborough, too. Without South's pre-empt the bidding goes 2♣ - 2♦ and then what?
#5
Posted 2020-August-18, 02:47
South's 3♣ looks OK to me. You have absolutely no defense, and it is difficult for the opponents to punish your bid at this vulnerability. Risky but tolerable, I'd say.
I would have tried some cue bids after 3♠ (in particular, 4♣) but I doubt it would have helped me reach 7♠. If the opponents do not preempt the auction I can systematically show a 30+ NT hand on the sequence 2♣-2♦-2♥-2♠-4NT, not discussed but by elimination stronger than 3NT (28-29). I assume partner would bid 5♠ (forcing, natural) over that, and if the stars line up just right I might jump to 7.
I would have tried some cue bids after 3♠ (in particular, 4♣) but I doubt it would have helped me reach 7♠. If the opponents do not preempt the auction I can systematically show a 30+ NT hand on the sequence 2♣-2♦-2♥-2♠-4NT, not discussed but by elimination stronger than 3NT (28-29). I assume partner would bid 5♠ (forcing, natural) over that, and if the stars line up just right I might jump to 7.
#6
Posted 2020-August-18, 19:02
AL78, on 2020-August-17, 13:23, said:
South had a gun to his head and was told he would be killed if he passed, or is this a modern style of must open on any absolute garbage third seat non-vulnerable?
It seems to me like the main alternative to 3♣ here would be 1NT rather than Pass. If that comes back doubled you run to clubs. If not, the backup plan is passing after Stayman or a 2♥ transfer; and after a 2♦ transfer you just bid 3♥. Whether that sows enough confusion to compensate for the extra bidding space though I am not so sure but assuming a strong NT and typical defences, it might well be.
(-: Zel :-)
Page 1 of 1