BBO Discussion Forums: Has a small doubleton often been regarded as control - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Has a small doubleton often been regarded as control

#1 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,569
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2021-December-13, 18:30

Just asking for a friend

Said friend could possibly have gotten away with a King or a void. Maybe even a singleton :)

But no

It wasn't to be and said friend's partner is a bit disappointed
0

#2 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,488
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2021-December-14, 11:03

Sort of (but typically not)

There are all sorts of different ways in which the notion of a "control" gets used in bridge.

If people are playing a natural style, controls often come into play during cue bidding sequences.
And, in a perfect world, the partnership has agreements about what does / does not constitute a control.

One such agreement might be whether the initial cue bids show first round controls or first / second round controls.
Another might be whether a cue bid promises an honor or might instead be bid with shortage.
Sometimes, you'll have agreements that you can't cue bid shortage in a suit where partner has shown length.

In these examples, I'd be quite surprised to see someone cue bidding a small doubleton unless this was done as a psych.

However, there are other styles of bidding and some of these rely on Control Asking Bids.
Many CAB systems have ways to show a small doubleton.
Alderaan delenda est
0

#3 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2021-December-14, 11:20

I would just add that if a partnership agrees to show indifferentiated first/second level controls in the Italian style, then it will occasionally be possible to show third level control (Q or small doubleton) having already affirmed or denied the first two levels of control in that suit.
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users