bidding i had 14 points i bid 1 h pr bid 2 s how many points would u think thr
#1
Posted 2022-October-19, 06:12
#2
Posted 2022-October-19, 06:21
#4
Posted 2022-October-19, 07:42
#5
Posted 2022-October-19, 13:15
If partner didn't play that, I would expect them to be playing the second most common option according to this poll, which is a weak jump shift; showing *less* than a 1♠ response (definitely not 6+).
But playing it as invitational 9-11 is reasonable too.
If partner made this bid without discussion, I would expect to be playing on BBO with a weak random partner, and they probably have 6-10 or so.
#6
Posted 2022-October-19, 14:15
If your partner is from North America, I would assume they think it's natural (shows 6 or so spades) and either:
- game forcing (old fashioned, but what it should be without discussion), or
- very weak (only will play well in spades, < 6 HCP. This is "more modern", and likely if they think it's this, it's because "everybody" (in their circle) plays it that way).
Unfortunately, if you guess wrong either way, you're headed for a zero/-6 IMPS.
Now, many players have agreed that it's something else yet. I have played:
- ART GF heart raise
- 4 hearts, 0-1 spades, and 8-10ish
- 4 hearts, 8-10ish, and a singleton somewhere
- 10ish, 5+spades and 4 hearts
- ART GF (almost) any hand
and I'm sure others will have other meanings yet (mostly raises of some sort). How do you know? Well, most of the people playing this weird stuff know they have to agree it first, so they'll have talked to you about it. But still - this is just one of the sequences that without discussion, you're on a guess; and with a pickup, you'll get it wrong sometime (and partner will blame you for it).
On the other end, if you make the 2♠ bid, what is partner going to think it is? Well, the discussion should make it obvious that "if you haven't discussed it with partner, try to find another sequence that isn't quite so prone to misunderstandings" (i.e. "don't do that then").
#7
Posted 2022-October-20, 07:28
I'm surprised that only mycroft mentioned very weak as a likely meaning though. It's a useful agreement and a hand worth a normal weak 2 opening can bid 1 here with no obvious disadvantages.
#8
Posted 2022-October-20, 08:48
George Carlin
#9
Posted 2022-October-20, 12:51
#11
Posted 2022-October-22, 03:35
Example: 1♦-1♠;2♣ You hold AJxxxx/Kxx/xx/Kx. If you can rebid 2♠ nonforcing but constructive opener can invite with support and pass with a misfit even if holding extras (or suggest some other contract). If you have to jump to 3♠ you may play there opposite shortness.
Invitational jump shifts are usually played for that same goal, which I think is technically worse. When I hold a minimum or slightly subminimum responding hand opposite an opener, usually the only reasonable game is in my long major. The same is not true when I hold an invitational hand. So bidding after the jump is usually easy if the jump shows a weak hand but may get involved on invitational hands when opener has extras but no fit.
#13
Posted 2022-October-30, 21:11
Some play it weak, which I can accept, others play it strong, which without agreements usually sees the auction end in 4S, making 7
More sophisticated players have other meanings for it.
#14
Posted 2022-November-01, 08:02
jillybean, on 2022-October-30, 21:11, said:
Some play it weak, which I can accept, others play it strong, which without agreements usually sees the auction end in 4S, making 7
More sophisticated players have other meanings for it.
I'm not a great favourite of weak jumps in general, but I like playing this as very weak (5+ cards 0-5 HCP). 2S is probably the ultimate bid in terms of preemptive value versus risk, so it makes sense to play it as drop dead and count your blessings.
#15
Posted 2022-November-01, 10:46
pescetom, on 2022-November-01, 08:02, said:
I like that