BBO Discussion Forums: Lead pards suit from AQ62? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lead pards suit from AQ62?

#1 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,457
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Yesterday, 22:30



Unusual auction to say the least.
Assuming that you will lead hearts, what are your agreements on leads from AQ62?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
0

#2 User is offline   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,161
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 23:11

If I were desperate to get partner on lead I might underlead my ace.. but unless bridge has evolved to 5 suits to give me a void, I'm not seeing such a reason.
0

#3 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,106
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted Yesterday, 23:46

I wouldn't lead heart on this auction + hand. But if you forced me to, there's no reason not to lead ace. That at least avoids complete debacles like declarer winning K in dummy or hand opposite a stiff. In general underleading aces is terrible at suit contracts. At your level maybe it should just never be done. Generally you only do it in desperate situations, to induce a misguess (and here no reason to, as you have the Q and it's not like declarer can misguess from KJ tight in dummy, or Kx dummy vs Jx in hand), or you desperately need to get partner in for a lead in another suit (e.g. you have void and want ruff at trick 2 to beat a slam). Here there's nothing on the side for partner to lead to your advantage so it'd be nuts to not lead ace, if choosing to lead the suit.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users