I open 1nt 15 -17 but maeby this hand can open 1nt? or better 1clubs
How it is better to open? Sistem 5° Major diamond 4°
#1
Posted 2009-May-18, 04:46
I open 1nt 15 -17 but maeby this hand can open 1nt? or better 1clubs
#2
Posted 2009-May-18, 04:50
1♣ it is. That doesn't deny a balanced hand

#3
Posted 2009-May-18, 05:47
In fact, this is closer to raise a natural invite of 2NT to 3 than to open 1♣

#4
Posted 2009-May-18, 06:01
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2009-May-18, 06:21
I would have expected something like 13.2, I think 12.7 is somewhat pessimistic.
#6
Posted 2009-May-18, 06:27
helene_t, on May 18 2009, 07:21 AM, said:
I would have expected something like 13.2, I think 12.7 is somewhat pessimistic.
In what it consists Kaplan/Ruben' s evaluator? Where I can find the rule? This is very interesting. Meanwhile thanks

#7
Posted 2009-May-18, 06:29
One or both of the major-queens off-side or in partners hand, makes those nice looking intermidiates worth a lot less than they look like.
Furthermore tha hand is aceless. Not a big minus in my book, but definately not a plus.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#8
Posted 2009-May-18, 06:30
#9
Posted 2009-May-18, 06:30
The Texture may be brilliant, but will only ensure, that the
overvalued jacks, are not overvalued anymore, this is 14
count, nothing more nothing less.
And if you play 15-17, this is not a 1NT opening.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#10
Posted 2009-May-18, 06:40
whereagles, on May 18 2009, 06:47 AM, said:
In fact, this is closer to raise a natural invite of 2NT to 3 than to open 1♣

A non-expert has come on this forum in order to try and improve his game.
Assuming this is sarcasm, isn't there a better place for it than here? I don't see how a beginner/intermediate can read through it. He may go on to think that jacks, no aces, 4333s are actually good?
#11
Posted 2009-May-18, 06:52
Maybe if I was in a partnership who upgrade a lot 14s - well perhaps then I would.
Nick
#12
Posted 2009-May-18, 07:42
bhindi, on May 18 2009, 12:40 PM, said:
whereagles, on May 18 2009, 06:47 AM, said:
In fact, this is closer to raise a natural invite of 2NT to 3 than to open 1♣

A non-expert has come on this forum in order to try and improve his game.
Assuming this is sarcasm, isn't there a better place for it than here? I don't see how a beginner/intermediate can read through it. He may go on to think that jacks, no aces, 4333s are actually good?
When I said "superb texture" I meant in terms of intermediate cards and solid tenaces to receive the lead. If you don't agree, well, too bad for you.
Also, what's this with people worrying how BI will read advice? To me that starts sounds more and more like a sorrow excuse to make a point that an actual desire to help.
#13
Posted 2009-May-18, 08:44
#14
Posted 2009-May-18, 11:16
George Carlin
#15
Posted 2009-May-18, 12:24
#16
Posted 2009-May-18, 12:28
#17
Posted 2009-May-18, 12:35
I'm indifferent between the actual hand and this one: kj2 / kj2 / kj7 / qj65
#18
Posted 2009-May-18, 13:06
Harald
#19
Posted 2009-May-18, 13:31
#20
Posted 2009-May-18, 16:12
Often my rule for these hand is facing 2 A and a 5 card suit do i want to be in 3Nt. Here the answer is yes. But i really hate 4333 and for slam purpose our hand will be very disapointing. So ill open 1nt only facing a passed hand.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."