BBO Discussion Forums: It's always right to pass these... - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

It's always right to pass these...

#1 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-December-07, 15:07

x KQJxxx QT98 Ax, 3rd seat r/w imps.

p p 1H 4S X p ?

edit: put w/w instead of r/w by mistake.
0

#2 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-December-07, 15:14

negative doubles through 7H?
Pass will probably get the usual criticism here, but opposite MY partner, I pass.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-December-07, 15:31

This is a bit tricky opposite a takeout double, because to make something at the five-level I need partner to have specifically an ace and two kings. On the other hand, passing with a singleton feels quite wrong, and we're unlikely to go more than one down.

I bid 4NT, planning to correct clubs to diamonds, which will show 6-4. Maybe they'll save, or maybe we're saving.

Opposite any other kind of double I'd pass.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2009-December-07, 15:54

I wouldn't pass, although I have no confidence that bidding on is the right decision. I quite like gnasher's 4NT with correction to 5.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#5 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-December-07, 16:26

Why didn't your partner take out to NT instead of double? Maybe because he didn't intend double as takeout.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#6 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2009-December-07, 16:52

I play this double as takeout, so I would not pass.

I also like gnasher's 4NT.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-December-07, 17:07

when I saw the problem I said 4NT wtp?, then I realised partner is a passed hand.

I still think our ODR is so huge that we cannot pass this, 4NT
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-December-07, 17:28

4NT here also
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-December-07, 17:57

aguahombre, on Dec 7 2009, 11:26 PM, said:

Why didn't your partner take out to NT instead of double? Maybe because he didn't intend double as takeout.

You may find this surprising, but I would expect to know how my partner intended his double.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#10 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-December-07, 18:19

gnasher, on Dec 7 2009, 04:57 PM, said:

aguahombre, on Dec 7 2009, 11:26 PM, said:

Why didn't your partner take out to NT instead of double? Maybe because he didn't intend double as takeout.

You may find this surprising, but I would expect to know how my partner intended his double.

yes, my exact point. And he expects me to know. too. As a passed hand, I would expect he held at least KTXX XX XXX KXXX for a double. If he had X XX AXXXX KQXXX or somesuch, I would expect 4NT

I guess what amazes me is that a passed hand would need two kinds of takeout here.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#11 User is offline   maggieb 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 339
  • Joined: 2008-October-15
  • Interests:Sewing, Cooking, and Square Dancing!

Posted 2009-December-07, 19:00

I would just pass, I think it is reasonably unlikely we can make a 5-level contract, and partner can easily have a secondary spade trick or something. -590 seems acceptably unlikely to me.
If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion. :)
0

#12 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-December-07, 19:51

Jlall, on Dec 7 2009, 04:07 PM, said:

x KQJxxx QT98 Ax, 3rd seat r/w imps.

p p 1H 4S X p ?

edit: put w/w instead of r/w by mistake.

1?? :o Doesn't 2 actually describe this hand better.
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#13 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-December-07, 20:24

4NT. Passing does seem wrong and they may well make say if partner has something like 2344. There are other hands too that might let us make 5x with not just an ace and two kings. Maybe A K QJ for a hook or AK QJ/Q10 or maybe A KJ Q and LHO doesn't find a club lead. Or even better (?), since we're r/w one of the opps may take another push.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#14 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-December-07, 20:31

aguahombre, on Dec 8 2009, 11:19 AM, said:

I guess what amazes me is that a passed hand would need two kinds of takeout here.

Because there are many many hands where you do not want to play at the 5level unilaterally when say partner has spade values. If we're doing the "take out-ing" that means partner has the spade length, right? Give partner say 3532 or 2542 and if your only takeout bid is 4NT which you may do with 2344 or (12)55 or 2254 or 12(46) forcing us to the 5level, that is just too sick.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#15 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2009-December-07, 20:40

Agree with the 4NT bidders.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#16 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-December-07, 22:07

Clee bid 4N against me and I said I would have done the same thing. Partner had Qxx Axx Kxx Kxxx, so you get to 5H and they get a diamond ruff -1.

At the other table my teammates also passed the 12 count (no doubt the only 2 people in the room who would do this...) but my hand only bid 3S so there was no similar decision.

Just checking to make sure I told him the right thing!
0

#17 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-December-07, 22:11

interesting that two people under 80 passed initially. I guess passing 4S doubled would have gotten lucky.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#18 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2009-December-08, 02:12

Does partner's double suggest a penalty bonanza(800+) is possible? Or just Max-pass?
I expect max-pass to accept a fix if that is where it is.
So, is there a penalty bonanza likely? HA +CAK +C-ruff +SK10 + 2xD =800. Try that.
0

#19 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,398
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2009-December-08, 05:10

Agree with 4NT. Not sure what I would have done with 5431 (probably pass) but with 6-4, 4NT is perfect.

Partner's pass is not mainstream these days but if that is the partnership's style then it's fine with me.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#20 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2009-December-08, 06:01

4NT, but if partner doesn't bid 5 under his own steam, I convert to 5.

(Wouldn't want to be in 5 when partner is 1-3 in the reds.)
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users