It's always right to pass these...
#1
Posted 2009-December-07, 15:07
p p 1H 4S X p ?
edit: put w/w instead of r/w by mistake.
#2
Posted 2009-December-07, 15:14
Pass will probably get the usual criticism here, but opposite MY partner, I pass.
#3
Posted 2009-December-07, 15:31
I bid 4NT, planning to correct clubs to diamonds, which will show 6-4. Maybe they'll save, or maybe we're saving.
Opposite any other kind of double I'd pass.
#4
Posted 2009-December-07, 15:54
#5
Posted 2009-December-07, 16:26
#6
Posted 2009-December-07, 16:52
I also like gnasher's 4NT.
#7
Posted 2009-December-07, 17:07
I still think our ODR is so huge that we cannot pass this, 4NT
#8
Posted 2009-December-07, 17:28
-P.J. Painter.
#9
Posted 2009-December-07, 17:57
aguahombre, on Dec 7 2009, 11:26 PM, said:
You may find this surprising, but I would expect to know how my partner intended his double.
#10
Posted 2009-December-07, 18:19
gnasher, on Dec 7 2009, 04:57 PM, said:
aguahombre, on Dec 7 2009, 11:26 PM, said:
You may find this surprising, but I would expect to know how my partner intended his double.
yes, my exact point. And he expects me to know. too. As a passed hand, I would expect he held at least KTXX XX XXX KXXX for a double. If he had X XX AXXXX KQXXX or somesuch, I would expect 4NT
I guess what amazes me is that a passed hand would need two kinds of takeout here.
#11
Posted 2009-December-07, 19:00
#12
Posted 2009-December-07, 19:51
Jlall, on Dec 7 2009, 04:07 PM, said:
p p 1H 4S X p ?
edit: put w/w instead of r/w by mistake.
1♥??
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#13
Posted 2009-December-07, 20:24
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#14
Posted 2009-December-07, 20:31
aguahombre, on Dec 8 2009, 11:19 AM, said:
Because there are many many hands where you do not want to play at the 5level unilaterally when say partner has spade values. If we're doing the "take out-ing" that means partner has the spade length, right? Give partner say 3532 or 2542 and if your only takeout bid is 4NT which you may do with 2344 or (12)55 or 2254 or 12(46) forcing us to the 5level, that is just too sick.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#15
Posted 2009-December-07, 20:40
#16
Posted 2009-December-07, 22:07
At the other table my teammates also passed the 12 count (no doubt the only 2 people in the room who would do this...) but my hand only bid 3S so there was no similar decision.
Just checking to make sure I told him the right thing!
#17
Posted 2009-December-07, 22:11
#18
Posted 2009-December-08, 02:12
I expect max-pass to accept a fix if that is where it is.
So, is there a penalty bonanza likely? HA +CAK +C-ruff +SK10 + 2xD =800. Try that.
#19
Posted 2009-December-08, 05:10
Partner's pass is not mainstream these days but if that is the partnership's style then it's fine with me.
#20
Posted 2009-December-08, 06:01
(Wouldn't want to be in 5♦ when partner is 1-3 in the reds.)
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher

Help
