World Cup 2010 Prediction Contest Join in & enjoy it :)
#522
Posted 2010-July-14, 17:13
Fluffy, on Jul 14 2010, 06:07 PM, said:
the "life" bar should go down even more on impact with the ground...
#523
Posted 2010-July-14, 20:10
#524
Posted 2010-July-15, 04:13
George Carlin
#525
Posted 2010-July-15, 04:41
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#526
Posted 2010-July-15, 06:52
gwnn, on Jul 15 2010, 05:13 AM, said:
If you'd read the Dutch newspapers you'd see that they agree with you.
This should have been a red card, and there was a good case for sending off Robben as well (and maybe van Bommel too?). From what I heard the yellow card of van Bronkhorst was nonsense but it didn't affect the game. I also heard that Iniesta should have received his second yellow for retaliating, and I saw clearly that just before the Spanish goal the Netherlands should have gotten a corner. That was pretty crucial with 4-5 minutes on the clock.
In the end, it could have gone both ways but the Spanish team was clearly better. The referee made a lot of extremely bad decisions, but the decisions were bad both ways. It's no coincidence that the Dutch team received 9 yellow cards, they made a lot of fouls to stop the Spanish attacks.
#527
Posted 2010-July-15, 08:35
With one exception, van Bommel shows this "way" every Saturday in the Bundesliga, playing for the FC Bayern, he should become many more red cards, but most of the refs show usually only the yellow one ( Bayern bonus...)
If he ever writes his football memoirs...."Winning Ugly"would be a good title for it.
#528
Posted 2010-July-15, 08:59
Quote
George Carlin
#529
Posted 2010-July-15, 09:11
gwnn, on Jul 15 2010, 09:59 AM, said:
Quote
From the number of bookings surely...
Portugal : 2 red, 7 yellow
Netherland: 2 red, 5 yellow
but..so far I can remember this match, the brutality of the fouls wasn't nearly so high as in last final.. and several of these cards has been shown for tactical hand play..
#530
Posted 2010-July-15, 10:29
http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/09/week-in...m-in-cape-town/
Caceres was given a yellow card and I don't remember anybody saying afterwards that he was a criminal and he deserved to be sent off or suspended for multiple games.
Van Bommel was fouling a lot, the Dutch committed more fouls(28-19, and since Spain had 60% of posesion it evens oout even more), but again which other one was brutal? And it should have been at least 20 for Spain, since right before the goal Eljia was sandwiched between Ramos and Fabregas at the edge of the Spain box, clear foul, not given, Spain counter-attacked and scored.
The referee was very bad, especially in extra time (Eljia foul, corner not given, Iniesta dive when Heitinga is sent off - just watch in slow motion how Heitinga has his hand on Iniesta's shoulder for a second and immediately AFTER he takes it off the shoulder Iniesta is extending his arm towards the back and falls off in a "he was pulling my arm" fashion) so the English media, to save face, started all this "ohh the Dutch were playing rugby in the final".
I am sure there are lots of games when one team have 9 (8??) more fouls than the other team and we don't get all this "ohh they played dirty" thing.
Before internet age you had a suspicion there are lots of "not-so-smart" people on the planet. Now you even know their names.
#531
Posted 2010-July-15, 11:07
andrei, on Jul 15 2010, 04:29 PM, said:
I don't think that the Dutch were particularly vicious per se - that implies they were doing it with some degree of premeditation. What I think they were trying to do was simply play a pressing game - which always runs the risks of some extras fouls - plus they were 'really up for it' as would any team be in the finals.
The ref had a difficult game to referee. Not saying he didn't get anything wrong - but I find it hard to imagine that anyone would have done a perfect job under the circumstances.
Nick
#532
Posted 2010-July-16, 01:32
#533
Posted 2010-July-16, 21:04
http://www.101greatg...isplay/6230864/
Should this be a straight red?
Anyway, I liked this the most (even better than Iniesta's dive when Heitinga was sent off): http://www.youtube.c...h?v=hcV04f2mDP4
Watch how injured Iniesta is after the tackle and how quickly he gets up when there is no foul called.
That's why I disagree with the idea that the Dutch played dirty or brutal, they played aggressively and Spanish players dived and complained all the time.
Before internet age you had a suspicion there are lots of "not-so-smart" people on the planet. Now you even know their names.
#534
Posted 2010-July-17, 15:45
andrei, on Jul 16 2010, 10:04 PM, said:
http://www.101greatg...isplay/6230864/
Should this be a straight red?
I thought sliding in from behind with both feets is a red card. (Although seeing the replay I am not quite sure whether it's the foul I meant.)
About the Iniesta "dive" - yeah maybe he could get up sooner, but I also know it hurts to get hit with studs, and it would take me much longer to get up. I take it you play soccer and get up right away when you get hit with someone's studs?
#535
Posted 2010-July-17, 16:33
#536
Posted 2010-July-17, 17:01
hanp, on Jul 17 2010, 05:33 PM, said:
Indeed (43 minutes better?), and you should be glad you aren't reading my posts after a German-Dutch final
#538
Posted 2010-July-18, 03:51
andrei, on Jul 15 2010, 04:29 PM, said:
This one:
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=elD7bcA_ZoI
EDIT: sorry I read now that you already posted it sorry.
And who said Iniesta fought back?
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=hcV04f2mDP4
Iniesta clearly did nothing at all.
I admit that Pujol was the guy who might deserve a second yellow card, but perhaps that was too much for a referee that wasn't showing second yellow cards to any dutch who deserved it also.
#539
Posted 2010-October-26, 06:37
#540
Posted 2010-October-26, 06:50
George Carlin