BBO Discussion Forums: Double and then what? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Double and then what?

#21 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2010-August-01, 10:20

Phil, on Aug 1 2010, 10:12 AM, said:

gnasher, on Aug 1 2010, 03:34 AM, said:

What do you think is a minimum for a 1♠ bid with this shape?

A King less.

What do you think a maximum 1♠ looks like?

Kit W. is a big advocate of allowing above-range overcalls. A King less than this one is still a 20 count and he would probably approve of 1S. I don't think even he would have bid 1S the first time with 23.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#22 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2010-August-01, 18:52

2D and I find this obvious. With so many AK's and a potential 5-3 major fit surely this is worth more than '23 hcp'.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#23 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2010-August-01, 19:07

1♠, I am in the gnasher camp. I agree that around 19HCP would be a typical minimum for this sequence, and that this hand is close to a max.

This is a very fine hand, but we are still not going anywhere without a fit. Bidding 2♦ won't help us to find out if partner has 5 hearts. 1♠ should pretty much guarantee exactly 5 cards IMO, we would usually be able to bid 2♠ with a 6 card suit. Therefore partner will often be able to bid 2♥ over 1♠ with 5 hearts and fewer than 3 spades, i.e. if we have an eight card heart fit I think we will find it more often by starting with 1♠. And if we don't have an eight card major fit, and if partner can't move over 1♠, we might not have a game anyway.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#24 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2010-August-01, 19:48

Ok let's say you bid 1♠ and partner has 2533 shape. Should he pass with xx xxxxx xxx xxx (which offers decent play for game). If so, what is the minimum he needs to bid again? Same questions if he is 3433.
http://bridgethoughts.blogspot.com
0

#25 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-August-02, 02:24

nigel_k, on Aug 2 2010, 02:48 AM, said:

Ok let's say you bid 1♠ and partner has 2533 shape. Should he pass with xx xxxxx xxx xxx (which offers decent play for game). If so, what is the minimum he needs to bid again? Same questions if he is 3433.

He should pass with either of these hands. I didn't say that 1♠ was the solution to all our problems. But nor is 2♦.

I think 3-card support and a queen is enough for him to raise, and ♥QJxxx is enough for him to bid 2♥. I don't really know, though - hands like this don't come up often enough to provide enough experience.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users